Open versus Arthroscopic Scapholunate Ligament Repair: A Systematic Review

Abstract Scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injuries have traditionally been treated via open approaches. Recent arthroscopic techniques have improved the ability to access the SLIL while preserving local blood supply and ligaments. Here, we present a systematic review comparing outcomes after arthroscopic versus open SLIL repair. A systematic search of PubMed was conducted for primary research articles evaluating open or arthroscopic SLIL repair. Inclusion criteria were primary articles examining open or arthroscopic repair of SLIL injuries. Data extracted included surgical interventions and indications, time from injury to surgery, length of follow-up, range of motion (ROM), reoperations, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographic results, and complications. Out of 226 studies screened, 15 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 982 SLIL repairs (827 arthroscopic, 155 open). The frequency-weighted mean follow-up was 41 months, with a mean age of 34 years (range 14–68). PROMs were significantly improved in arthroscopic compared with open repairs, with visual analog scale (VAS) scores of 1.13 versus 4.69 (p < 0.05), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores of 9.93 versus 21.93 (p < 0.05), and Mayo scores of 87.55 versus 80.28 (p < 0.05). Functional outcomes also revealed increased range of motion and strength in the arthroscopic group: flexion (67.04 degrees vs. 51.73 degrees), extension (72.56 versus vs. 51.97 degrees), and strength (41.94 kg vs. 34.59 kg; all p < 0.05). Radiographic outcomes demonstrated a significant albeit smaller postoperative scapholunate (SL) angle, with arthroscopic repairs at 54.08 degrees and open repairs at 59.10 degrees (p < 0.05). Arthroscopic SLIL repair is associated with improved pain, ROM, strength, and PROMs compared with open repair, along with a more favorable postoperative SL angle. These findings support the potential benefits of arthroscopic approaches in managing SLIL injuries and may inform future treatment algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2698-9531
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open versus Arthroscopic Scapholunate Ligament Repair: A Systematic Review

Eric R. Wagner, Joanne Y. Zhou, Owen A. Ross, Michael B. Gottschalk et al.
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Open versus Arthroscopic Scapholunate Ligament Repair: A Systematic Review

Eric R. Wagner, Joanne Y. Zhou, Owen A. Ross, Michael B. Gottschalk, Nina Suh, Bo Zhou, Frank Vazquez, Musab Gulzar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injuries have traditionally been treated via open approaches. Recent arthroscopic techniques have improved the ability to access the SLIL while preserving local blood supply and ligaments. Here, we present a systematic review comparing outcomes after arthroscopic versus open SLIL repair. A systematic search of PubMed was conducted for primary research articles evaluating open or arthroscopic SLIL repair. Inclusion criteria were primary articles examining open or arthroscopic repair of SLIL injuries. Data extracted included surgical interventions and indications, time from injury to surgery, length of follow-up, range of motion (ROM), reoperations, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographic results, and complications. Out of 226 studies screened, 15 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 982 SLIL repairs (827 arthroscopic, 155 open). The frequency-weighted mean follow-up was 41 months, with a mean age of 34 years (range 14–68). PROMs were significantly improved in arthroscopic compared with open repairs, with visual analog scale (VAS) scores of 1.13 versus 4.69 (p < 0.05), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores of 9.93 versus 21.93 (p < 0.05), and Mayo scores of 87.55 versus 80.28 (p < 0.05). Functional outcomes also revealed increased range of motion and strength in the arthroscopic group: flexion (67.04 degrees vs. 51.73 degrees), extension (72.56 versus vs. 51.97 degrees), and strength (41.94 kg vs. 34.59 kg; all p < 0.05). Radiographic outcomes demonstrated a significant albeit smaller postoperative scapholunate (SL) angle, with arthroscopic repairs at 54.08 degrees and open repairs at 59.10 degrees (p < 0.05). Arthroscopic SLIL repair is associated with improved pain, ROM, strength, and PROMs compared with open repair, along with a more favorable postoperative SL angle. These findings support the potential benefits of arthroscopic approaches in managing SLIL injuries and may inform future treatment algorithms.

Journal of Wrist Surgery
Memorial Hermann (US), Emory University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Memorial Hermann–Texas Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.