Comparing Machine Learning Methods for Offline Applications with Short Lookback and Limited Input

This study focuses on a comparative study of machine learning methods on offline weather forecasting with short lookback windows and limited computational resources. Using 90 days of single-station GSOD inputs, models predict 15-day horizons for temperature, precipitation, wind speed, and visibility. Evaluation with NashSutcliffe efficiency, RMSE, and inference time shows that Linear Regression is a surprisingly strong and stable baseline, excelling in wind speed and remaining competitive across variables. Transformer models perform best for temperature by capturing long-range dependencies, while sequence-to-sequence GRUs outperform others on precipitation and visibility. In contrast, XGBoost and persistence baselines consistently underperform in this constrained setup. In inference time, LR outperform all other methods due to its simplicity. The results indicate that simple linear models can excel in this scenario compare to deep learning approaches, while specialized neural architectures provide targeted gains, suggesting a combination of models could be the most effective for practical low-resource forecasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Natural Science
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/2025.dl27105
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Machine Learning Methods for Offline Applications with Short Lookback and Limited Input

Hong Lai
Theoretical and Natural Science
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

Comparing Machine Learning Methods for Offline Applications with Short Lookback and Limited Input

Hong Lai
article en

Abstract

This study focuses on a comparative study of machine learning methods on offline weather forecasting with short lookback windows and limited computational resources. Using 90 days of single-station GSOD inputs, models predict 15-day horizons for temperature, precipitation, wind speed, and visibility. Evaluation with NashSutcliffe efficiency, RMSE, and inference time shows that Linear Regression is a surprisingly strong and stable baseline, excelling in wind speed and remaining competitive across variables. Transformer models perform best for temperature by capturing long-range dependencies, while sequence-to-sequence GRUs outperform others on precipitation and visibility. In contrast, XGBoost and persistence baselines consistently underperform in this constrained setup. In inference time, LR outperform all other methods due to its simplicity. The results indicate that simple linear models can excel in this scenario compare to deep learning approaches, while specialized neural architectures provide targeted gains, suggesting a combination of models could be the most effective for practical low-resource forecasting.

Theoretical and Natural ScienceVol. 132(1)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.