Updated comparison of the UHECR energy spectra measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory and the Telescope Array

The Pierre Auger and Telescope Array joint Working Group on the UHECR energy spectrum was established in 2012 to analyze energy scale uncertainties in both experiments and to investigate their systematic differences, particularly in the spectral shape of the flux measurements. Previous studies have indeed shown that, within systematic uncertainties, the energy spectra measured by the two observatories are consistent below $10\,\mathrm{EeV}$. However, at higher energies, a significant difference remains. In this work, we re-examine this discrepancy in greater detail and explore its possible origins. We consider systematic and statistical uncertainties, including the conversion from directly measured observables to energy and the calculation of exposures. We present an updated energy scale comparison between the two experiments and updated flux measurements in the common declination band.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22323/1.501.0381
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Updated comparison of the UHECR energy spectra measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory and the Telescope Array

F. Salamida
1 citations
Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
0.73
article

Updated comparison of the UHECR energy spectra measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory and the Telescope Array

F. Salamida
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Pierre Auger and Telescope Array joint Working Group on the UHECR energy spectrum was established in 2012 to analyze energy scale uncertainties in both experiments and to investigate their systematic differences, particularly in the spectral shape of the flux measurements. Previous studies have indeed shown that, within systematic uncertainties, the energy spectra measured by the two observatories are consistent below $10\,\mathrm{EeV}$. However, at higher energies, a significant difference remains. In this work, we re-examine this discrepancy in greater detail and explore its possible origins. We consider systematic and statistical uncertainties, including the conversion from directly measured observables to energy and the calculation of exposures. We present an updated energy scale comparison between the two experiments and updated flux measurements in the common declination band.

National Science Foundation, University of Utah, Strong, European Commission, National Research Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy, Grantová Agentura České Republiky, Academia Sinica, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, National Research Foundation of Korea, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, University of Tokyo, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações, Vlaamse regering, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Helmholtz Alliance for Astroparticle Physics, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, RIKEN, Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.