Towards Quantifying Simulated Image Sensor Data: A Survey and Discussion on GAN Evaluation Metrics

Simulations are capable of solving many of today’s problems with collecting real-world data for training and testing machine learning (ML) approaches for mobility applications. However, to effectively utilize synthetic data, it must be ensured that they possess the necessary quality, meaning they are ‘‘similar enough’’ to real-world data and include all characteristics that ML approaches require to learn task-relevant features. As the quantitative quality assessment of image data is a difficult task, the quality of simulated images is in practice mostly determined through cross-dataset tests or performance comparisons after the addition of synthetic data. This has the disadvantage that comparable annotated real-world data are still required, which can only be obtained with significant effort or are rarely available in some domains. In recent years, research in the field of developing metrics to quantify the image quality produced by generative neural networks has made notable progress. But in general, these metrics are not trivially transferable to simulated images, as the desired metric properties diverge between Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and simulations. Therefore, this work analyses the differences in requirements and discusses the suitability of established GAN performance metrics for quantifying simulationbased synthetic image sensor data on a theoretical basis. Thereby, a survey on existing GAN evaluation metrics is included.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58895/ksp/1000179597-8
Primary Topic
CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Quantifying Simulated Image Sensor Data: A Survey and Discussion on GAN Evaluation Metrics

Anne Sielemann
CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
article

Towards Quantifying Simulated Image Sensor Data: A Survey and Discussion on GAN Evaluation Metrics

Anne Sielemann
article en

Abstract

Simulations are capable of solving many of today’s problems with collecting real-world data for training and testing machine learning (ML) approaches for mobility applications. However, to effectively utilize synthetic data, it must be ensured that they possess the necessary quality, meaning they are ‘‘similar enough’’ to real-world data and include all characteristics that ML approaches require to learn task-relevant features. As the quantitative quality assessment of image data is a difficult task, the quality of simulated images is in practice mostly determined through cross-dataset tests or performance comparisons after the addition of synthetic data. This has the disadvantage that comparable annotated real-world data are still required, which can only be obtained with significant effort or are rarely available in some domains. In recent years, research in the field of developing metrics to quantify the image quality produced by generative neural networks has made notable progress. But in general, these metrics are not trivially transferable to simulated images, as the desired metric properties diverge between Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and simulations. Therefore, this work analyses the differences in requirements and discusses the suitability of established GAN performance metrics for quantifying simulationbased synthetic image sensor data on a theoretical basis. Thereby, a survey on existing GAN evaluation metrics is included.

Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.