Usability testing of the COMET (Clinical Outcome Measures Electronic Toolkit) mobile app for outcome measure data collection in individuals with lower limb amputation and clinicians

Evidence-based clinical care and outcomes research are essential for developing objectively based standards of practice in prosthetic and orthotic care. Traditionally, outcome measures have been collected using paper-based methods. However, digital collection of these measures may offer several advantages. The COMET© (Clinical Outcome Measures Electronic Toolkit) mobile app was developed to facilitate the assessment of commonly used patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures in prosthetics and orthotics. The usability of the COMET app was evaluated among 15 individuals with lower limb amputation and nine clinicians using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The mean SUS score among individuals with lower limb amputation was 84 ± 12 (Grade: A; Percentile: 90-95; Adjective: Excellent; Acceptable), and the mean SUS score among the clinicians was 80 ± 14 (Grade: A-; Percentile: 85-89; Adjective: Good; Acceptable). There were no significant differences in SUS score between the two groups, indicating that the app was acceptable to both groups of participants in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Assistive Technology
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2555241
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usability testing of the COMET (Clinical Outcome Measures Electronic Toolkit) mobile app for outcome measure data collection in individuals with lower limb amputation and clinicians

Sarah R. Chang, Toshiki Kobayashi, Sander L. Hitzig, Adam K. Arabian et al.
Assistive Technology
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Usability testing of the COMET (Clinical Outcome Measures Electronic Toolkit) mobile app for outcome measure data collection in individuals with lower limb amputation and clinicians

Sarah R. Chang, Toshiki Kobayashi, Sander L. Hitzig, Adam K. Arabian, Amanda L. Mayo, Jungyoon Kim, Silvia Raschke, David Boone, Shaghayegh Mirbaha, Jessica Garries
article en

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical care and outcomes research are essential for developing objectively based standards of practice in prosthetic and orthotic care. Traditionally, outcome measures have been collected using paper-based methods. However, digital collection of these measures may offer several advantages. The COMET© (Clinical Outcome Measures Electronic Toolkit) mobile app was developed to facilitate the assessment of commonly used patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures in prosthetics and orthotics. The usability of the COMET app was evaluated among 15 individuals with lower limb amputation and nine clinicians using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The mean SUS score among individuals with lower limb amputation was 84 ± 12 (Grade: A; Percentile: 90-95; Adjective: Excellent; Acceptable), and the mean SUS score among the clinicians was 80 ± 14 (Grade: A-; Percentile: 85-89; Adjective: Good; Acceptable). There were no significant differences in SUS score between the two groups, indicating that the app was acceptable to both groups of participants in clinical settings.

Assistive Technology
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), British Columbia Institute of Technology (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA), Orthocare Innovations (United States) (US), Sunnybrook Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.