Assessing Spatial Accessibility Uncertainty with Dempster–Shafer Theory: A Comparison of Potential and Revealed Accessibility

This study introduces a framework for comparing and integrating revealed and potential accessibility maps, using the Dempster–Shafer theory to identify regions with varying spatial accessibility while accounting for uncertainty. It presents a method for determining revealed accessibility from individuals’ trajectory data, weighting accessibility inversely to the square of uncertainty. This dual approach aids urban planners in making more reliable decisions. The methodology is applied to supply centers, including shops, restaurants, and sports centers, using data from the Mobile Data Challenge (MDC) in Vaud, Switzerland. The results show good access to shops in the northwestern and southeastern regions and good access to restaurants in the eastern regions. The final maps indicate that areas with low access to sports centers form the highest proportion (62.7%) of regions with low access, while those with low access to shopping centers form the lowest (9.3%). The findings suggest the need for more sports centers in Nyon and Jura-Nord Vaudois and more accessible restaurants in Nyon and southern Aigle. Additionally, the analysis reveals that lower station densities correlate with smaller discrepancies between real and expected accessibilities, while higher population densities are linked to lower uncertainty, underscoring the importance of considering density in spatial accessibility assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14100370
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Spatial Accessibility Uncertainty with Dempster–Shafer Theory: A Comparison of Potential and Revealed Accessibility

Roya Esmaeili Tajabadi, Christophe Claramunt, Parham Pahlavani, Amin Hosseinpoor Milaghardan
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Assessing Spatial Accessibility Uncertainty with Dempster–Shafer Theory: A Comparison of Potential and Revealed Accessibility

Roya Esmaeili Tajabadi, Christophe Claramunt, Parham Pahlavani, Amin Hosseinpoor Milaghardan
article en

Abstract

This study introduces a framework for comparing and integrating revealed and potential accessibility maps, using the Dempster–Shafer theory to identify regions with varying spatial accessibility while accounting for uncertainty. It presents a method for determining revealed accessibility from individuals’ trajectory data, weighting accessibility inversely to the square of uncertainty. This dual approach aids urban planners in making more reliable decisions. The methodology is applied to supply centers, including shops, restaurants, and sports centers, using data from the Mobile Data Challenge (MDC) in Vaud, Switzerland. The results show good access to shops in the northwestern and southeastern regions and good access to restaurants in the eastern regions. The final maps indicate that areas with low access to sports centers form the highest proportion (62.7%) of regions with low access, while those with low access to shopping centers form the lowest (9.3%). The findings suggest the need for more sports centers in Nyon and Jura-Nord Vaudois and more accessible restaurants in Nyon and southern Aigle. Additionally, the analysis reveals that lower station densities correlate with smaller discrepancies between real and expected accessibilities, while higher population densities are linked to lower uncertainty, underscoring the importance of considering density in spatial accessibility assessments.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationVol. 14(10)
Graduate University of Advanced Technology (IR), University of Tehran (IR), Institut de Recherche de l’École Navale (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.