Do Mass Tort Negligence Class Actions Adequately Compensate Victims and Effectively Deter Tortfeasor Wrongdoing?

The objectives of the class action procedural device and the tort of negligence overlap are that they both seek to compensate victims for their loss and, according to some, they both seek to deter tortfeasor wrongdoing. However, in practice, does the class action procedure facilitate the fulfillment of these dual aims? This article explains how the class action aids compensation and deterrence, but also addresses the significant issues that hinder the class action’s effectiveness in meeting its compensatory and deterrence aims in an Australian and New Zealand context. It concludes by laying the foundation for further research to improve the effectiveness of class actions or by possibly adopting supplementary or alternative remedial/regulatory procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laws
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14050071
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Mass Tort Negligence Class Actions Adequately Compensate Victims and Effectively Deter Tortfeasor Wrongdoing?

Michael Legg, Nikki Chamberlain
Laws
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Do Mass Tort Negligence Class Actions Adequately Compensate Victims and Effectively Deter Tortfeasor Wrongdoing?

Michael Legg, Nikki Chamberlain
article en

Abstract

The objectives of the class action procedural device and the tort of negligence overlap are that they both seek to compensate victims for their loss and, according to some, they both seek to deter tortfeasor wrongdoing. However, in practice, does the class action procedure facilitate the fulfillment of these dual aims? This article explains how the class action aids compensation and deterrence, but also addresses the significant issues that hinder the class action’s effectiveness in meeting its compensatory and deterrence aims in an Australian and New Zealand context. It concludes by laying the foundation for further research to improve the effectiveness of class actions or by possibly adopting supplementary or alternative remedial/regulatory procedures.

LawsVol. 14(5)
University of Auckland (NZ), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Mass Tort Negligence Class Actions Adequately Compensate Victims and Effectively Deter Tortfeasor Wrongdoing? — Michael Legg, Nikki Chamberlain · Laws (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS