Velocity profiles of high-calibre ice hockey players: a comparison between fixed and dynamic skating blade holders

Detailed skating velocity profiles of high-calibre ice hockey players are lacking, and an increasing number of ice hockey players are using dynamic skating blade holders, but the impact of these skates on performance remains unclear. This study aims to compare velocity profiles between dynamic and fixed blade holders across various skating techniques. Twenty high-calibre skaters from one of the three highest-ranked leagues in Sweden (age 19.7 ± 4.1 years, body mass 77.9 ± 7.6 kg) completed three maximal trials involving linear forward sprints, forward c-cuts, and backward c-cuts on two separate occasions using two different types of blade holders. Split times were recorded at 5 m intervals from 5–40 m and average velocity was calculated for each distance segment. Velocity increased every 5 m up to 40 m, independent of the blade holder type across all techniques. No significant differences in performance were observed for linear forward sprinting or forward c-cuts between the blade holder types. However, backward c-cuts showed a significant improvement in speed with the dynamic holders at several intervals: 0–5 m (2.42 m/s vs. 2.38 m/s, p = 0.048), 15–20 m (5.86 m/s vs. 5.76 m/s, p = 0.009), and 35–40 m (6.84 m/s vs. 6.67 m/s, p = 0.021), resulting in 1-2% faster split times. The results indicate that high-calibre skaters progressively increase their velocity up to 40 m in both forward and backward skating, without reaching maximal velocity. Additionally, dynamic blade holders may offer a performance advantage during backward skating, making them a valuable option for players who frequently utilise this technique in competitive play.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Footwear Science
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2025.2563837
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Velocity profiles of high-calibre ice hockey players: a comparison between fixed and dynamic skating blade holders

T Arndt, Henrik Petré, Niklas Psilander
1 citations
Footwear Science
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
0.67
article

Velocity profiles of high-calibre ice hockey players: a comparison between fixed and dynamic skating blade holders

T Arndt, Henrik Petré, Niklas Psilander
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Detailed skating velocity profiles of high-calibre ice hockey players are lacking, and an increasing number of ice hockey players are using dynamic skating blade holders, but the impact of these skates on performance remains unclear. This study aims to compare velocity profiles between dynamic and fixed blade holders across various skating techniques. Twenty high-calibre skaters from one of the three highest-ranked leagues in Sweden (age 19.7 ± 4.1 years, body mass 77.9 ± 7.6 kg) completed three maximal trials involving linear forward sprints, forward c-cuts, and backward c-cuts on two separate occasions using two different types of blade holders. Split times were recorded at 5 m intervals from 5–40 m and average velocity was calculated for each distance segment. Velocity increased every 5 m up to 40 m, independent of the blade holder type across all techniques. No significant differences in performance were observed for linear forward sprinting or forward c-cuts between the blade holder types. However, backward c-cuts showed a significant improvement in speed with the dynamic holders at several intervals: 0–5 m (2.42 m/s vs. 2.38 m/s, p = 0.048), 15–20 m (5.86 m/s vs. 5.76 m/s, p = 0.009), and 35–40 m (6.84 m/s vs. 6.67 m/s, p = 0.021), resulting in 1-2% faster split times. The results indicate that high-calibre skaters progressively increase their velocity up to 40 m in both forward and backward skating, without reaching maximal velocity. Additionally, dynamic blade holders may offer a performance advantage during backward skating, making them a valuable option for players who frequently utilise this technique in competitive play.

Footwear ScienceVol. 18(1)
Karolinska Institutet (SE), Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.