Comparison of Total Mesopancreatic Excision and Conventional Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: Early Postoperative Outcomes

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the early postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with total mesopancreatic excision (TMpE) versus conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy (Co-PD) for pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head cancer between January 2021 and December 2024 in our clinic and had a pathological diagnosis of PDAC were included. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the surgical technique performed (TMpE-PD vs. Co-PD). Demographic characteristics and early postoperative clinicopathological data were compared between the groups. <i>Results</i>: A total of 41 patients were included: 17 (41.5%) underwent TMpE-PD and 24 (58.5%) underwent Co-PD. Demographic and clinicopathological parameters were comparable between the groups. Although not statistically significant, the TMpE-PD group demonstrated higher R0 resection rates (58.8% vs. 45.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.412) and greater lymph node yield (33.9 vs. 29.1; <i>p</i> = 0.757) compared to the Co-PD group. Overall postoperative complications were more frequent in the TMpE-PD group (82.4% vs. 63.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.034). A smaller pancreatic duct diameter was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications in both groups, approaching statistical significance (<i>p</i> = 0.053). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the surgical technique was not an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.14-2.83; <i>p</i> = 0.56). No direct correlation was found between resection margin status (R0 vs. R1) and the development of postoperative complications. <i>Conclusions</i>: TMpE demonstrated non-significant trends toward higher R0 resection rates and greater lymph node yield compared with conventional PD. These findings suggest possible oncological benefits without significantly increasing perioperative morbidity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101725
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Total Mesopancreatic Excision and Conventional Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: Early Postoperative Outcomes

Tarkan Ünek, Muhammet Berkay Sakaoglu, Tufan Egeli, Mücahit Özbilgin et al.
Medicina
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Comparison of Total Mesopancreatic Excision and Conventional Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: Early Postoperative Outcomes

Tarkan Ünek, Muhammet Berkay Sakaoglu, Tufan Egeli, Mücahit Özbilgin, Özgül Sağol, İlkay Tuğba Ünek, Cihan Ağalar, Emre Karadenİz, Anıl Aysal Agalar, Caner Bektas, Gokce Kıran Kazancı
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the early postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with total mesopancreatic excision (TMpE) versus conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy (Co-PD) for pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head cancer between January 2021 and December 2024 in our clinic and had a pathological diagnosis of PDAC were included. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the surgical technique performed (TMpE-PD vs. Co-PD). Demographic characteristics and early postoperative clinicopathological data were compared between the groups. <i>Results</i>: A total of 41 patients were included: 17 (41.5%) underwent TMpE-PD and 24 (58.5%) underwent Co-PD. Demographic and clinicopathological parameters were comparable between the groups. Although not statistically significant, the TMpE-PD group demonstrated higher R0 resection rates (58.8% vs. 45.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.412) and greater lymph node yield (33.9 vs. 29.1; <i>p</i> = 0.757) compared to the Co-PD group. Overall postoperative complications were more frequent in the TMpE-PD group (82.4% vs. 63.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.034). A smaller pancreatic duct diameter was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications in both groups, approaching statistical significance (<i>p</i> = 0.053). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the surgical technique was not an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.14-2.83; <i>p</i> = 0.56). No direct correlation was found between resection margin status (R0 vs. R1) and the development of postoperative complications. <i>Conclusions</i>: TMpE demonstrated non-significant trends toward higher R0 resection rates and greater lymph node yield compared with conventional PD. These findings suggest possible oncological benefits without significantly increasing perioperative morbidity.

MedicinaVol. 61(10)
Dokuz Eylül University (TR), State Hospital (GB), Bağcılar Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.