Bearing Capacity Design of Strength Composite Piles Considering Dominant Failure Modes and Calibrated Adjustment Coefficients

Significant discrepancies persist between the predicted and measured bearing capacities of Strength Composite (SC) piles in engineering practice, largely due to incomplete consideration of dominant failure modes and the absence of scientifically calibrated adjustment coefficients. Existing design specifications treat side and tip resistance inconsistently and often neglect failures induced by insufficient pile material strength, which compromises accuracy and reliability. To address these limitations, this study systematically analyzed static load test data from 159 SC piles across 44 projects. Statistical evaluation revealed clear dependencies between soil type, pile–soil interface performance, and failure mechanisms, from which stratified adjustment coefficients of side resistance and the unified adjustment coefficient of tip resistance were derived. On this basis, a new calculation method for pile capacity was developed that, for the first time, explicitly integrates material strength limitations and interface failure mechanisms into design. Validation against 112 additional test piles confirmed that over 50% of predicted-to-measured ratios approximated 1.0, and 82.1% fell within ±20%. The study proposes a calculation method for SC pile bearing capacity that is broadly applicable, simple in form, and explicitly accounts for dominant failure modes, thereby providing both theoretical rigor and engineering practicality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910313
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bearing Capacity Design of Strength Composite Piles Considering Dominant Failure Modes and Calibrated Adjustment Coefficients

Zhongdong Wang, Ning Zhang, Lei Guo, Feng Zhou et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
0.95
article

Bearing Capacity Design of Strength Composite Piles Considering Dominant Failure Modes and Calibrated Adjustment Coefficients

Zhongdong Wang, Ning Zhang, Lei Guo, Feng Zhou, Yan Xiong, Heng Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Significant discrepancies persist between the predicted and measured bearing capacities of Strength Composite (SC) piles in engineering practice, largely due to incomplete consideration of dominant failure modes and the absence of scientifically calibrated adjustment coefficients. Existing design specifications treat side and tip resistance inconsistently and often neglect failures induced by insufficient pile material strength, which compromises accuracy and reliability. To address these limitations, this study systematically analyzed static load test data from 159 SC piles across 44 projects. Statistical evaluation revealed clear dependencies between soil type, pile–soil interface performance, and failure mechanisms, from which stratified adjustment coefficients of side resistance and the unified adjustment coefficient of tip resistance were derived. On this basis, a new calculation method for pile capacity was developed that, for the first time, explicitly integrates material strength limitations and interface failure mechanisms into design. Validation against 112 additional test piles confirmed that over 50% of predicted-to-measured ratios approximated 1.0, and 82.1% fell within ±20%. The study proposes a calculation method for SC pile bearing capacity that is broadly applicable, simple in form, and explicitly accounts for dominant failure modes, thereby providing both theoretical rigor and engineering practicality.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(19)
Nanjing Tech University (CN), Qingdao Installation & Construction (China) (CN)
Nanjing Tech University
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.