Science Teaching and Curriculum Emphases in Preschool–lessons from a Development Project

Abstract This article reports on the kind of science that comes into focus in Swedish preschool work teams’ discussions of their participation in a development project called Science Kids. Such knowledge is valuable for future competence development initiatives and the implementation of support materials. The study is conducted in cooperation with a mid-sized Swedish municipality. Empirical data consists of pre- and post-questionnaires and focus-group discussions. Data were analysed through a directed content analysis supported by the framework of curriculum emphases (Roberts, 1982). The results show that the work teams highlighted children’s joy in exploring science as the most important aim of science in preschool (children aged 1–5 years). Such aims were, according to the participants, met in the Science Kids, but they also experienced that there was a strong focus on learning the correct science concepts. The participants were ambivalent in relation to the learning of science concepts. On the one hand, they saw opportunities for children to put words on what they encountered in everyday life (such as naming bugs they encountered in the neighbourhood). On the other hand, the teachers worried that a focus on concepts would create a feeling among the children that they had to provide correct answers instead of trying new ideas or daring to ask questions. We discuss implicit messages about science that accompanied the project and provide suggestions for future competence development projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Science Education
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10295-5
Primary Topic
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science Teaching and Curriculum Emphases in Preschool–lessons from a Development Project

Marie Fridberg, Andréas Redfors, Lotta Leden
Research in Science Education
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
article

Science Teaching and Curriculum Emphases in Preschool–lessons from a Development Project

Marie Fridberg, Andréas Redfors, Lotta Leden
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article reports on the kind of science that comes into focus in Swedish preschool work teams’ discussions of their participation in a development project called Science Kids. Such knowledge is valuable for future competence development initiatives and the implementation of support materials. The study is conducted in cooperation with a mid-sized Swedish municipality. Empirical data consists of pre- and post-questionnaires and focus-group discussions. Data were analysed through a directed content analysis supported by the framework of curriculum emphases (Roberts, 1982). The results show that the work teams highlighted children’s joy in exploring science as the most important aim of science in preschool (children aged 1–5 years). Such aims were, according to the participants, met in the Science Kids, but they also experienced that there was a strong focus on learning the correct science concepts. The participants were ambivalent in relation to the learning of science concepts. On the one hand, they saw opportunities for children to put words on what they encountered in everyday life (such as naming bugs they encountered in the neighbourhood). On the other hand, the teachers worried that a focus on concepts would create a feeling among the children that they had to provide correct answers instead of trying new ideas or daring to ask questions. We discuss implicit messages about science that accompanied the project and provide suggestions for future competence development projects.

Research in Science Education
Kristianstad University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.