The Dragon in the Desert: China’s Diplomatic Calculus in the Israel–Palestine Conflict

China’s involvement in the Israel–Palestine conflict during the war in Gaza reflects a strategic maneuvering that is aimed at positioning itself as the leader of the Global South while exerting pressure on the United States. In contrast to the staunch support of the United States for Israel, China has adopted a seemingly neutral stance that advocates for a two-state solution. This approach challenges a perceived American hypocrisy and positions China as an alternative to Western powers, particularly in the Arab world, where public opinion has increasingly been against Israel and the United States. China’s efforts to influence the conflict have faced limitations, however. Despite recent shifts in its stance that include more direct criticism of Israeli actions and condemnation of U.S. support in the United Nations, there has been no tangible evidence to suggest that Beijing’s involvement could de-escalate tensions in Gaza. As such, this paper examines China’s diplomatic approach toward the Israel–Palestine conflict by analyzing its historical position, intentions, evolving strategy, efforts at mediation, and implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Issues & Studies
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013251125500122
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dragon in the Desert: China’s Diplomatic Calculus in the Israel–Palestine Conflict

Nadeem Ahmed Moonakal, Amrita Jash
Issues & Studies
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

The Dragon in the Desert: China’s Diplomatic Calculus in the Israel–Palestine Conflict

Nadeem Ahmed Moonakal, Amrita Jash
article en

Abstract

China’s involvement in the Israel–Palestine conflict during the war in Gaza reflects a strategic maneuvering that is aimed at positioning itself as the leader of the Global South while exerting pressure on the United States. In contrast to the staunch support of the United States for Israel, China has adopted a seemingly neutral stance that advocates for a two-state solution. This approach challenges a perceived American hypocrisy and positions China as an alternative to Western powers, particularly in the Arab world, where public opinion has increasingly been against Israel and the United States. China’s efforts to influence the conflict have faced limitations, however. Despite recent shifts in its stance that include more direct criticism of Israeli actions and condemnation of U.S. support in the United Nations, there has been no tangible evidence to suggest that Beijing’s involvement could de-escalate tensions in Gaza. As such, this paper examines China’s diplomatic approach toward the Israel–Palestine conflict by analyzing its historical position, intentions, evolving strategy, efforts at mediation, and implications.

Issues & StudiesVol. 61(04)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.