DNA barcoding and metabarcoding reveal labeling accuracy and species substitution in squid and surimi from Los Angeles markets

Accurate species identification of seafood remains a persistent challenge in local and global marketplaces. This is particularly true for processed products that obscure diagnostic features. Here, we conduct a dual-molecular investigation into frozen squid and imitation crab products sold at American, Asian, and Hispanic grocery stores in Los Angeles, California, to assess label integrity under current U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. Forty-eight squid samples from 13 retailers underwent DNA barcoding and yielded high percentage matches to 10 species across six genera. Despite broad labeling as ‘squid’, all samples matched FDA Acceptable Market Names with a 0 % mislabeling rate. In contrast, DNA metabarcoding of 43 imitation crab products revealed an average of six detected species per sample, with only 72 % of samples containing at least one package listed seafood ingredient. Gadus chalcogrammus (Alaska pollock) and Doryteuthis gahi (Patagonian squid) were the most frequently detected species, with the former often included as a listed ingredient and the latter never listed. 95 % of imitation crab products contained at least one undeclared species, including detection of endangered shark species and squid species prone to illegal fishing. Our results illustrate a high labeling fidelity for single species packaged squid, yet a discrepancy between legal labeling allowances and actual product composition for blended species surimi. Based on our findings, we encourage refining and the addition of routine DNA-based surveillance of blended seafood products to improve labeling credibility, consumer confidence, and supply chain integrity. • 100 % of sampled squid were accurately labeled based on current FDA guidelines. • 38 unique species were detected in imitation crab samples using DNA metabarcoding. • DNA sequencing failed to detect any listed ingredient for 28 % of imitation crab samples. • Nearly all imitation crab samples contained undeclared species including squids or sharks. • Results illustrate a discrepancy between legal label allowances & surimi product content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Control
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2025.111733
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Identification and Quantification in Food
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DNA barcoding and metabarcoding reveal labeling accuracy and species substitution in squid and surimi from Los Angeles markets

Demian A. Willette, Margarita L. Joaquin
1 citations
Food Control
Identification and Quantification in Food
0.81
article

DNA barcoding and metabarcoding reveal labeling accuracy and species substitution in squid and surimi from Los Angeles markets

Demian A. Willette, Margarita L. Joaquin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate species identification of seafood remains a persistent challenge in local and global marketplaces. This is particularly true for processed products that obscure diagnostic features. Here, we conduct a dual-molecular investigation into frozen squid and imitation crab products sold at American, Asian, and Hispanic grocery stores in Los Angeles, California, to assess label integrity under current U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. Forty-eight squid samples from 13 retailers underwent DNA barcoding and yielded high percentage matches to 10 species across six genera. Despite broad labeling as ‘squid’, all samples matched FDA Acceptable Market Names with a 0 % mislabeling rate. In contrast, DNA metabarcoding of 43 imitation crab products revealed an average of six detected species per sample, with only 72 % of samples containing at least one package listed seafood ingredient. Gadus chalcogrammus (Alaska pollock) and Doryteuthis gahi (Patagonian squid) were the most frequently detected species, with the former often included as a listed ingredient and the latter never listed. 95 % of imitation crab products contained at least one undeclared species, including detection of endangered shark species and squid species prone to illegal fishing. Our results illustrate a high labeling fidelity for single species packaged squid, yet a discrepancy between legal labeling allowances and actual product composition for blended species surimi. Based on our findings, we encourage refining and the addition of routine DNA-based surveillance of blended seafood products to improve labeling credibility, consumer confidence, and supply chain integrity. • 100 % of sampled squid were accurately labeled based on current FDA guidelines. • 38 unique species were detected in imitation crab samples using DNA metabarcoding. • DNA sequencing failed to detect any listed ingredient for 28 % of imitation crab samples. • Nearly all imitation crab samples contained undeclared species including squids or sharks. • Results illustrate a discrepancy between legal label allowances & surimi product content.

Food ControlVol. 181
Loyola Marymount University (US), Species360 (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Identification and Quantification in Food
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.