Comparing apples and apples; evaluating the impact of conventional and organic management on the soil microbial communities of apple orchards

Ecological intensification of food production systems is gaining interest globally. Such processes seek to better support ecosystem services and improve soil health with approaches that have a stronger consideration for biological processes. Here, we investigated the effect of ecological intensification on soil health in an apple orchard context. To do this, we compared soil physicochemical properties and microbial diversity and composition across conventional orchards, organic orchards, and spatially paired remnant native ecosystem sites. Minimal differences in physicochemical properties were found between the conventional and organic orchards; however, microbial communities were distinct from each other. Organic management had no impact on either bacterial or fungal alpha diversity or heterogeneity but did increase dung saprotroph abundance. Soil physicochemical and microbial analysis revealed that orchards and native sites were significantly different, with orchards having significantly higher bacterial diversity and fungal heterogeneity. We found that soil physicochemical characteristics and microbial community parameters varied inconsistently between organic and conventional orchards. This variability is likely the result of legacy effects from historical land practices or inherent variation in management, irrespective of conventional or organic labels. In conclusion, apple orchard management was associated with distinct microbial communities and fungal trait abundance which may be indicative of alternate nutrient cycling and energy pathways. The similarities between organic and conventional apple orchard management highlight the necessity for a nuanced approach that identifies and promotes beneficial strategies for sustainable soil and agroecosystem management. We suggest that future research focus on individual practices/combination of practices of ecological intensification, rather than the broad farm classification (i.e. conventional vs organic). • Apple orchard management associated with distinct microbial communities • Fungal and bacterial alpha diversity were not affected by orchard management type. • Organic agriculture increased the abundance of dung saprotrophs. • Signs of ecological intensification were present in conventional orchards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Soil Ecology
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106470
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing apples and apples; evaluating the impact of conventional and organic management on the soil microbial communities of apple orchards

Timothy R. Cavagnaro, Lynne M. Macdonald, Erinne Stirling, Martin F. Breed et al.
1 citations
Applied Soil Ecology
Organic Food and Agriculture
1.75
article

Comparing apples and apples; evaluating the impact of conventional and organic management on the soil microbial communities of apple orchards

Timothy R. Cavagnaro, Lynne M. Macdonald, Erinne Stirling, Martin F. Breed, Kate E. Matthews
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ecological intensification of food production systems is gaining interest globally. Such processes seek to better support ecosystem services and improve soil health with approaches that have a stronger consideration for biological processes. Here, we investigated the effect of ecological intensification on soil health in an apple orchard context. To do this, we compared soil physicochemical properties and microbial diversity and composition across conventional orchards, organic orchards, and spatially paired remnant native ecosystem sites. Minimal differences in physicochemical properties were found between the conventional and organic orchards; however, microbial communities were distinct from each other. Organic management had no impact on either bacterial or fungal alpha diversity or heterogeneity but did increase dung saprotroph abundance. Soil physicochemical and microbial analysis revealed that orchards and native sites were significantly different, with orchards having significantly higher bacterial diversity and fungal heterogeneity. We found that soil physicochemical characteristics and microbial community parameters varied inconsistently between organic and conventional orchards. This variability is likely the result of legacy effects from historical land practices or inherent variation in management, irrespective of conventional or organic labels. In conclusion, apple orchard management was associated with distinct microbial communities and fungal trait abundance which may be indicative of alternate nutrient cycling and energy pathways. The similarities between organic and conventional apple orchard management highlight the necessity for a nuanced approach that identifies and promotes beneficial strategies for sustainable soil and agroecosystem management. We suggest that future research focus on individual practices/combination of practices of ecological intensification, rather than the broad farm classification (i.e. conventional vs organic). • Apple orchard management associated with distinct microbial communities • Fungal and bacterial alpha diversity were not affected by orchard management type. • Organic agriculture increased the abundance of dung saprotrophs. • Signs of ecological intensification were present in conventional orchards.

Applied Soil EcologyVol. 215
Flinders University (AU), Wine Australia (AU), Agriculture and Food (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Organic Food and Agriculture
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.