Fast Analysis Method of Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test Data: Examples from Four Different Shale Formations (Bakken, Three Forks, Wolfcamp, and Eagle Ford)

Abstract This study introduces a new methodology for analyzing DFIT data by applying Gaussian Pressure Transient (GPT) solutions to model pressure fall-off behavior in hydraulically fractured wells. Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT) data from 7 wells were analyzed; the wells were drilled in four different shale formations (Wolfcamp, Eagle Ford, Bakken, and Three Forks). All wells analyzed were hydraulically fractured, and as a first step in the fracturing treatment operation, each of the completion companies involved in the different wells applied a DFIT test to determine the ISIP and the formation leak-off rate to estimate the permeability. The original pressure fall-off excel sheets, availed by different operators, were analyzed in detail. For each test, the relevant part of the leak-off test data was identified and isolated for further in-depth study of the leak-off rate. Instead of relying on traditional DFIT interpretation techniques such as G-function or Carter leak-off assumptions, the method leverages the Gaussian diffusion model to capture the pressure propagation and leak-off characteristics more accurately. The Gaussian pressure transient analysis combines pressure and volume balancing principles directly on the actual field measurements. The results show that the Gaussian method successfully matched the pressure fall-off curves for all 7 wells, with improved accuracy in estimating leak-off rates and hydraulic diffusivity. Moreover, the GPT method requires only a short-term pressure fall-off curve to accurately determine reservoir properties, and this can significantly shorten the typical long fall-of time in low permeability rocks. The Gaussian pressure model provided excellent matches with field data, confirming the method's reliability for unconventional reservoir analysis. The proposed methodology thus offers significant advancement over conventional techniques, better aligning DFIT analysis with the complex realities of unconventional reservoirs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/226622-ms
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast Analysis Method of Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test Data: Examples from Four Different Shale Formations (Bakken, Three Forks, Wolfcamp, and Eagle Ford)

Ruud Weijermars, Ahmed Al-Shaikh
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
article

Fast Analysis Method of Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test Data: Examples from Four Different Shale Formations (Bakken, Three Forks, Wolfcamp, and Eagle Ford)

Ruud Weijermars, Ahmed Al-Shaikh
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study introduces a new methodology for analyzing DFIT data by applying Gaussian Pressure Transient (GPT) solutions to model pressure fall-off behavior in hydraulically fractured wells. Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT) data from 7 wells were analyzed; the wells were drilled in four different shale formations (Wolfcamp, Eagle Ford, Bakken, and Three Forks). All wells analyzed were hydraulically fractured, and as a first step in the fracturing treatment operation, each of the completion companies involved in the different wells applied a DFIT test to determine the ISIP and the formation leak-off rate to estimate the permeability. The original pressure fall-off excel sheets, availed by different operators, were analyzed in detail. For each test, the relevant part of the leak-off test data was identified and isolated for further in-depth study of the leak-off rate. Instead of relying on traditional DFIT interpretation techniques such as G-function or Carter leak-off assumptions, the method leverages the Gaussian diffusion model to capture the pressure propagation and leak-off characteristics more accurately. The Gaussian pressure transient analysis combines pressure and volume balancing principles directly on the actual field measurements. The results show that the Gaussian method successfully matched the pressure fall-off curves for all 7 wells, with improved accuracy in estimating leak-off rates and hydraulic diffusivity. Moreover, the GPT method requires only a short-term pressure fall-off curve to accurately determine reservoir properties, and this can significantly shorten the typical long fall-of time in low permeability rocks. The Gaussian pressure model provided excellent matches with field data, confirming the method's reliability for unconventional reservoir analysis. The proposed methodology thus offers significant advancement over conventional techniques, better aligning DFIT analysis with the complex realities of unconventional reservoirs.

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fast Analysis Method of Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test Data: Examples from Four Different Shale Formations (Bakken, Three Forks, Wolfcamp, and Eagle Ford) — Ruud Weijermars, Ahmed Al-Shaikh · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS