Microbiological and chemical risks in foods: Public perception versus risk ranking

Food safety is a critical public health concern, particularly regarding microbiological hazards (MHs) and chemical hazards (CHs) in infant foods. This study examined the risk perceptions of MHs and CHs associated with fruit puree and infant formula within the general public (n = 3585) across the European Union with a focus on comparing general public views against outcomes of recently published risk ranking results based on scientific assessment. In terms of public risk perception, 1) The general public perceived bacteria causing severe sickness (e.g., Listeria monocytogenes) or mild sickness (e.g., Bacillus cereus) as the highest concern and viruses or unknown hazards as the lowest; 2) The general public perceived the greatest and lowest concern for agricultural (e.g., pesticides) and fraudulent (e.g., melamine) contaminants, respectively; 3) The public exhibited a higher concern for CHs than MHs, likely due to a general distrust of chemicals in foods. In terms of comparison between public perception and risk ranking, 1) public perception of hazard severity showed limited alignment with risk rankings (ρ = 0.67 for MHs and ρ = 0.15 for CHs); 2) in terms of risk, public perception aligned well with risk rankings for MH risks, with (ρ = 0.70 for infant formula and ρ = 0.97 for fruit puree). In contrast for CH risks, there was a strong misalignment between public perception and risk rankings showing correlation coefficients of ρ = -0.70 for infant formula and ρ = -0.20 for fruit puree. The public tended to overestimate risks from agricultural and packaging-related chemicals while underestimating risks associated with environmental and natural contaminants. These findings highlight the need for targeted communication strategies to bridge the gap between public perception and risk rankings based on scientific assessment, particularly for chemical risks. Clear communication of scientific evidence, addressing misconceptions, and tailoring messages to audience needs could enhance public awareness and trigger appropriate actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Research International
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2025.117586
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbiological and chemical risks in foods: Public perception versus risk ranking

Jeanne‐Marie Membré, Heidy M.W. den Besten, Rallou Thomopoulos, Kah Yen Claire Yeak et al.
Food Research International
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Microbiological and chemical risks in foods: Public perception versus risk ranking

Jeanne‐Marie Membré, Heidy M.W. den Besten, Rallou Thomopoulos, Kah Yen Claire Yeak, Philippe Palmont, M.H. Zwietering, Gilles Rivière
article en

Abstract

Food safety is a critical public health concern, particularly regarding microbiological hazards (MHs) and chemical hazards (CHs) in infant foods. This study examined the risk perceptions of MHs and CHs associated with fruit puree and infant formula within the general public (n = 3585) across the European Union with a focus on comparing general public views against outcomes of recently published risk ranking results based on scientific assessment. In terms of public risk perception, 1) The general public perceived bacteria causing severe sickness (e.g., Listeria monocytogenes) or mild sickness (e.g., Bacillus cereus) as the highest concern and viruses or unknown hazards as the lowest; 2) The general public perceived the greatest and lowest concern for agricultural (e.g., pesticides) and fraudulent (e.g., melamine) contaminants, respectively; 3) The public exhibited a higher concern for CHs than MHs, likely due to a general distrust of chemicals in foods. In terms of comparison between public perception and risk ranking, 1) public perception of hazard severity showed limited alignment with risk rankings (ρ = 0.67 for MHs and ρ = 0.15 for CHs); 2) in terms of risk, public perception aligned well with risk rankings for MH risks, with (ρ = 0.70 for infant formula and ρ = 0.97 for fruit puree). In contrast for CH risks, there was a strong misalignment between public perception and risk rankings showing correlation coefficients of ρ = -0.70 for infant formula and ρ = -0.20 for fruit puree. The public tended to overestimate risks from agricultural and packaging-related chemicals while underestimating risks associated with environmental and natural contaminants. These findings highlight the need for targeted communication strategies to bridge the gap between public perception and risk rankings based on scientific assessment, particularly for chemical risks. Clear communication of scientific evidence, addressing misconceptions, and tailoring messages to audience needs could enhance public awareness and trigger appropriate actions.

Food Research InternationalVol. 221(Pt 4)
Université de Montpellier (FR), Institut Agro Montpellier (FR), Ingénierie des Agropolymères et Technologies Emergentes (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail (FR), Oniris (FR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.