Staying or switching: How companies react to audit firm penalties

We investigate the relationship between corporate governance characteristics and the change of penalized audit firms based on financing, reputation, and client relationship perspectives. Based on a sample of client companies of penalized audit firms in China between 2008 and 2023, we find that companies with financing incentives and good reputations tend to change penalized audit firms, while companies with close “audit firm-client” relationships tend to maintain cooperation. The above conclusion still stands after a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. Heterogeneity tests indicate that the intensity of the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC)'s penalties, the company's level of real earnings management, and the nature of property rights all affect the company's decision to change the penalized audit firm. Further research finds that the company's continued cooperation with the penalized audit firm can harm its accounting information quality and accounting conservatism. The findings of our study enrich the existing research on the factors influencing the change of penalized audit firms in emerging markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104639
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Staying or switching: How companies react to audit firm penalties

Danglun Luo, Kexin Zhang, Pengfei Gao
International Review of Economics & Finance
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Staying or switching: How companies react to audit firm penalties

Danglun Luo, Kexin Zhang, Pengfei Gao
article en

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between corporate governance characteristics and the change of penalized audit firms based on financing, reputation, and client relationship perspectives. Based on a sample of client companies of penalized audit firms in China between 2008 and 2023, we find that companies with financing incentives and good reputations tend to change penalized audit firms, while companies with close “audit firm-client” relationships tend to maintain cooperation. The above conclusion still stands after a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. Heterogeneity tests indicate that the intensity of the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC)'s penalties, the company's level of real earnings management, and the nature of property rights all affect the company's decision to change the penalized audit firm. Further research finds that the company's continued cooperation with the penalized audit firm can harm its accounting information quality and accounting conservatism. The findings of our study enrich the existing research on the factors influencing the change of penalized audit firms in emerging markets.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 104
Shihezi University (CN), Swansea University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Staying or switching: How companies react to audit firm penalties — Danglun Luo, Kexin Zhang, et al. · International Review of Economics & Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS