f-RecX: A framework for designing effective textual explanations in recommender systems’ user interfaces

Recommender systems (RecSys) have become ubiquitous in users’ daily digital interactions, significantly influencing decision-making processes. As these systems grow in algorithmic complexity, effective explanations for non-expert users become essential to fostering understanding and trust. While academic research explores diverse explanation methods, commercial applications predominantly employ textual explanations due to their implementation efficiency and user familiarity. However, the effectiveness of these textual explanations is often compromised by suboptimal presentation within RecSys user interfaces (UIs), leading to reduced user engagement and comprehension. This issue is particularly relevant given the recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) for generating RecSys explanations. We introduce f-RecX, a conceptual framework for characterizing and designing effective textual explanations in RecSys UIs. Based on a two-phase methodology combining qualitative user studies and quantitative evaluations, f-RecX maps four input dimensions (Explanation Style, Goals, Domain Dynamics, and Recommender Systems Technique) to an output dimension focused on visual representation. The framework aims to enhance the’consumability’ of textual explanations by making them easier to locate and comprehend, and more valuable for non-expert users. We demonstrate f-RecX’s applicability through a usage scenario and analysis of existing RecSys UIs, offering valuable insights for enhancing explainability and user experience. • f-RecX uniquely bridges algorithmic and human-centered design by integrating four input dimensions (Explanation Style, Goals, Domain Dynamics, and Recommender Techniques) with visual presentation parameters, addressing the gap between explanation content generation and effective UI implementation. • The framework introduces the concept of explanation ”consumability” - how easily users can locate, understand, and derive value from explanations - providing empirically validated visual design guidelines including optimal font sizes (24-32px), positioning (top-left), and explanation length ( 20 words). • Through a comprehensive two-phase methodology combining empathy workshops and quantitative surveys, f-RecX provides design guidance that demonstrates how visual characteristics significantly impact explanation effectiveness, particularly relevant for LLM-generated explanations in commercial applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103627
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

f-RecX: A framework for designing effective textual explanations in recommender systems’ user interfaces

Gabriela Morgenshtern, Mennatallah El‐Assady, Jürgen Bernard, Ibrahim Al-Hazwani
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

f-RecX: A framework for designing effective textual explanations in recommender systems’ user interfaces

Gabriela Morgenshtern, Mennatallah El‐Assady, Jürgen Bernard, Ibrahim Al-Hazwani
article en

Abstract

Recommender systems (RecSys) have become ubiquitous in users’ daily digital interactions, significantly influencing decision-making processes. As these systems grow in algorithmic complexity, effective explanations for non-expert users become essential to fostering understanding and trust. While academic research explores diverse explanation methods, commercial applications predominantly employ textual explanations due to their implementation efficiency and user familiarity. However, the effectiveness of these textual explanations is often compromised by suboptimal presentation within RecSys user interfaces (UIs), leading to reduced user engagement and comprehension. This issue is particularly relevant given the recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) for generating RecSys explanations. We introduce f-RecX, a conceptual framework for characterizing and designing effective textual explanations in RecSys UIs. Based on a two-phase methodology combining qualitative user studies and quantitative evaluations, f-RecX maps four input dimensions (Explanation Style, Goals, Domain Dynamics, and Recommender Systems Technique) to an output dimension focused on visual representation. The framework aims to enhance the’consumability’ of textual explanations by making them easier to locate and comprehend, and more valuable for non-expert users. We demonstrate f-RecX’s applicability through a usage scenario and analysis of existing RecSys UIs, offering valuable insights for enhancing explainability and user experience. • f-RecX uniquely bridges algorithmic and human-centered design by integrating four input dimensions (Explanation Style, Goals, Domain Dynamics, and Recommender Techniques) with visual presentation parameters, addressing the gap between explanation content generation and effective UI implementation. • The framework introduces the concept of explanation ”consumability” - how easily users can locate, understand, and derive value from explanations - providing empirically validated visual design guidelines including optimal font sizes (24-32px), positioning (top-left), and explanation length ( 20 words). • Through a comprehensive two-phase methodology combining empathy workshops and quantitative surveys, f-RecX provides design guidance that demonstrates how visual characteristics significantly impact explanation effectiveness, particularly relevant for LLM-generated explanations in commercial applications.

International Journal of Human-Computer StudiesVol. 205
University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.