Failure probability assessment of step-like landslide using a hybrid interval prediction method under uncertain conditions

To address prediction errors and limited information extraction in machine learning (ML)-based interval prediction, a hybrid model was proposed for interval estimation and failure assessment of step-like landslides under uncertainty. The model decomposed displacements into trend and periodic components via Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) and K-shape clustering. The Residual and Moving Block Bootstrap methods were used to generate pseudo datasets. Polynomial regression was adopted for trend forecasting, whereas the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks were employed for periodic displacement prediction. An Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) was used to estimate the noise variance, enabling the construction of Prediction Intervals (PIs) and quantification of displacement uncertainty. Failure probabilities (Pf) were derived from PIs using an improved tangential angle criterion and reliability analysis. The model was validated on three step-like landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, achieving stability assessment accuracies of 99.88% (XD01), 99.93% (ZG93), 99.89% (ZG118), and 100% for ZG110 and ZG111 across the Baishuihe and Bazimen landslides. For the Shuping landslide, the predictions aligned with field observations before and after the 2014–2015 remediation, with Pf remaining near zero post-2015 except for occasional peaks. The model outperformed conventional ML approaches by yielding narrower PIs. At XD01 with 90% PI nominal confidence level (PINC), the coverage width-based criterion (CWC) and PI average width (PIAW) were 3.38 mm. The mean values of the PIs exhibited high accuracy, with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.28 mm and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.39 mm. These results demonstrate the robustness of the proposed model in improving landslide risk assessment and decision-making under uncertainty.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.08.008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure probability assessment of step-like landslide using a hybrid interval prediction method under uncertain conditions

Lifeng Wen, Ting Wang, Yanlong Li, Zheng Zhou et al.
1 citations
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
article

Failure probability assessment of step-like landslide using a hybrid interval prediction method under uncertain conditions

Lifeng Wen, Ting Wang, Yanlong Li, Zheng Zhou, Sun Xin-jian, Ye Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To address prediction errors and limited information extraction in machine learning (ML)-based interval prediction, a hybrid model was proposed for interval estimation and failure assessment of step-like landslides under uncertainty. The model decomposed displacements into trend and periodic components via Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) and K-shape clustering. The Residual and Moving Block Bootstrap methods were used to generate pseudo datasets. Polynomial regression was adopted for trend forecasting, whereas the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks were employed for periodic displacement prediction. An Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) was used to estimate the noise variance, enabling the construction of Prediction Intervals (PIs) and quantification of displacement uncertainty. Failure probabilities (Pf) were derived from PIs using an improved tangential angle criterion and reliability analysis. The model was validated on three step-like landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, achieving stability assessment accuracies of 99.88% (XD01), 99.93% (ZG93), 99.89% (ZG118), and 100% for ZG110 and ZG111 across the Baishuihe and Bazimen landslides. For the Shuping landslide, the predictions aligned with field observations before and after the 2014–2015 remediation, with Pf remaining near zero post-2015 except for occasional peaks. The model outperformed conventional ML approaches by yielding narrower PIs. At XD01 with 90% PI nominal confidence level (PINC), the coverage width-based criterion (CWC) and PI average width (PIAW) were 3.38 mm. The mean values of the PIs exhibited high accuracy, with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.28 mm and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.39 mm. These results demonstrate the robustness of the proposed model in improving landslide risk assessment and decision-making under uncertainty.

Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical EngineeringVol. 17(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.