The Political Determination of Gaza's Health System Destruction and Reconstruction and the Limitations of International Medical Deployments

Gaza's health system has been devastated by a confluence of political determinants that long predated the 2023-25 Israeli military assault and were dramatically intensified during it. Using historical, political economy, ethical, and health systems lenses, this article argues that settler colonialism, military occupation, and a protracted blockade created chronic shortages, workforce erosion, and institutional fragility, leaving services acutely vulnerable to targeted destruction of facilities and personnel. We examine the role and limitations of international medical deployments and field hospitals, which provided lifesaving care but operated under stringent access controls, supply interdictions, and security risks. Short rotations, poor continuity of care, and donor restrictions that discourage engagement with local authorities contributed to parallel systems, fragmentation, and dependency. We then identify four intersecting barriers to reconstruction: ongoing blockade and humanitarian access denials; lack of protection and accountability for attacks on health; governance fragmentation and the sidelining of Palestinian leadership; and donor fatigue amid politicised aid. The article proposes a justice-centred pathway for recovery that prioritises accountability and reparations, an end to the blockade and occupation, inclusive Palestinian-led governance, alignment of aid with national plans, avoidance of parallel structures through early transition to local ownership, workforce stabilisation, and long-term partnerships. Without these political preconditions, reconstruction efforts will remain fragile and inequitable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Political Determination of Gaza's Health System Destruction and Reconstruction and the Limitations of International Medical Deployments

Muhammad Hamza Shah, Abdulwhhab Abu Alamrain, James Smith, Bilal Irfan et al.
2 citations
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Health and Conflict Studies
5.63
article

The Political Determination of Gaza's Health System Destruction and Reconstruction and the Limitations of International Medical Deployments

Muhammad Hamza Shah, Abdulwhhab Abu Alamrain, James Smith, Bilal Irfan, Osaama Hassan Khan, Belal Aldabbour, Roberto Sirvent, Mohamed Fawaz, Abeerah Muhammad, Karim Fikry, Izzeddin Lulu, Mohammed Halimy, Ruba Musallam, Hadeel Obeid, Arham Ali, Khansa Irfan, Ibrahim Omeish, Yousef Barakat, Tamer Alkurd, Yassar Arain
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Gaza's health system has been devastated by a confluence of political determinants that long predated the 2023-25 Israeli military assault and were dramatically intensified during it. Using historical, political economy, ethical, and health systems lenses, this article argues that settler colonialism, military occupation, and a protracted blockade created chronic shortages, workforce erosion, and institutional fragility, leaving services acutely vulnerable to targeted destruction of facilities and personnel. We examine the role and limitations of international medical deployments and field hospitals, which provided lifesaving care but operated under stringent access controls, supply interdictions, and security risks. Short rotations, poor continuity of care, and donor restrictions that discourage engagement with local authorities contributed to parallel systems, fragmentation, and dependency. We then identify four intersecting barriers to reconstruction: ongoing blockade and humanitarian access denials; lack of protection and accountability for attacks on health; governance fragmentation and the sidelining of Palestinian leadership; and donor fatigue amid politicised aid. The article proposes a justice-centred pathway for recovery that prioritises accountability and reparations, an end to the blockade and occupation, inclusive Palestinian-led governance, alignment of aid with national plans, avoidance of parallel structures through early transition to local ownership, workforce stabilisation, and long-term partnerships. Without these political preconditions, reconstruction efforts will remain fragile and inequitable.

The International Journal of Health Planning and ManagementVol. 41(1)
Northwestern University (US), London Metropolitan University (GB), Queen's University Belfast (GB), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Texas Christian University (US), Harvard University (US), Islamic University of Gaza (PS), University of Lancashire (GB), Al-Aqsa University (PS), Al-Quds University (PS), University of Michigan (US), Dar Al-Shifa Hospital (PS), Al-Ahli Hospital (QA), Harvard College Observatory (US), Lahey Medical Center (US), Medacta (United States) (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Baylor Scott & White Health (US), Loma Linda University Children's Hospital (US), University College London (GB), University of Palestine (PS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health and Conflict Studies
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.