Effectiveness and safety of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial

BackgroundHigh-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has shown potential for improving cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).ObjectiveTo evaluate whether HD-tDCS enhances cognitive function in individuals with MCI.MethodsThis was a triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. The anodal electrode was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and surrounded by four cathode electrodes (2 mA for 25 min, daily for 10 sessions). Tests were performed at baseline, after 2-week stimulation, at 1 month, and at 3 months. The primary outcome was global cognition measured by Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument and secondary outcomes included memory, language, executive function, and attention tests. Group differences were analyzed using linear mixed model (LMM).ResultsFifty patients with MCI were randomized to the sham (n = 25) and HD-tDCS groups (n = 25). No significant differences were observed between the HD-tDCS and sham groups in global cognition or other neuropsychological measures. However, subgroup analysis revealed a significant three-way interaction between apolipoprotein E (<i>APOE</i>) allele 4 status, tDCS condition, and time. <i>APOE4</i>-positive patients receiving HD-tDCS showed significantly greater improvement in language function, as measured by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition vocabulary, compared to <i>APOE4</i>-negative patients in the sham group (p = 0.028). Adverse effects were mild and comparable between groups.ConclusionsHD-tDCS did not enhance global cognition in MCI patients overall. Preliminary findings demonstrated a potential language benefit was observed in <i>APOE4</i>-postitive individuals. These exploratory findings warrant further investigation in larger, biomarker-stratified studies.<b>Trial registration</b>The study was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov under NCT04121156.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251376547
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and safety of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial

Chih‐Kuang Liang, Yu‐Te Lin, Cheng‐Sheng Chen, Hsin-Ya Kuo et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Effectiveness and safety of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial

Chih‐Kuang Liang, Yu‐Te Lin, Cheng‐Sheng Chen, Hsin-Ya Kuo, Ying‐Hsin Hsu, Che‐Sheng Chu, Hsiu-Chu Shen, Wei‐Zhe Liang, Shiou‐Lan Chen, Hsin‐An Chang, Chih‐Chuan Pan
article en

Abstract

BackgroundHigh-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has shown potential for improving cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).ObjectiveTo evaluate whether HD-tDCS enhances cognitive function in individuals with MCI.MethodsThis was a triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. The anodal electrode was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and surrounded by four cathode electrodes (2 mA for 25 min, daily for 10 sessions). Tests were performed at baseline, after 2-week stimulation, at 1 month, and at 3 months. The primary outcome was global cognition measured by Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument and secondary outcomes included memory, language, executive function, and attention tests. Group differences were analyzed using linear mixed model (LMM).ResultsFifty patients with MCI were randomized to the sham (n = 25) and HD-tDCS groups (n = 25). No significant differences were observed between the HD-tDCS and sham groups in global cognition or other neuropsychological measures. However, subgroup analysis revealed a significant three-way interaction between apolipoprotein E (<i>APOE</i>) allele 4 status, tDCS condition, and time. <i>APOE4</i>-positive patients receiving HD-tDCS showed significantly greater improvement in language function, as measured by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition vocabulary, compared to <i>APOE4</i>-negative patients in the sham group (p = 0.028). Adverse effects were mild and comparable between groups.ConclusionsHD-tDCS did not enhance global cognition in MCI patients overall. Preliminary findings demonstrated a potential language benefit was observed in <i>APOE4</i>-postitive individuals. These exploratory findings warrant further investigation in larger, biomarker-stratified studies.<b>Trial registration</b>The study was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov under NCT04121156.

Journal of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 108(1)
National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (TW), Tajen University (TW), Min-Hwei College of Health Care Management (TW), Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (TW), National Defense Medical Center (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.