The global war on drugs: militarism and its human rights consequences

This article presents an analytical framework that explains how militarism emerged as the prevailing paradigm in narcotic governance and its implications for human rights. The framework comprises four interconnected mechanisms—dehumanization, moralistic justifications, intensified state coercion, and a culture of impunity—that uphold and legitimize militarized drug policies. Dehumanization portrays populations as expendable threats, while moralistic narratives depict repression as necessary for maintaining public order and security. These processes enable intensified state coercion, evident in militarized policing, mass incarceration, and extrajudicial violence, while a culture of impunity protects perpetrators from accountability, consequently perpetuating cycles of state violence. This framework contributes to scholarship in international relations, security studies, and political sociology by demonstrating how states and other transnational as well as domestic actors institutionalize expanded and intensified violence in narcotic drug governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251364102
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The global war on drugs: militarism and its human rights consequences

Salvador Santino F. Regilme
2 citations
Critical Sociology
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
17.04
article

The global war on drugs: militarism and its human rights consequences

Salvador Santino F. Regilme
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article presents an analytical framework that explains how militarism emerged as the prevailing paradigm in narcotic governance and its implications for human rights. The framework comprises four interconnected mechanisms—dehumanization, moralistic justifications, intensified state coercion, and a culture of impunity—that uphold and legitimize militarized drug policies. Dehumanization portrays populations as expendable threats, while moralistic narratives depict repression as necessary for maintaining public order and security. These processes enable intensified state coercion, evident in militarized policing, mass incarceration, and extrajudicial violence, while a culture of impunity protects perpetrators from accountability, consequently perpetuating cycles of state violence. This framework contributes to scholarship in international relations, security studies, and political sociology by demonstrating how states and other transnational as well as domestic actors institutionalize expanded and intensified violence in narcotic drug governance.

Critical Sociology
Leiden University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The global war on drugs: militarism and its human rights consequences — Salvador Santino F. Regilme · Critical Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS