DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF FOCUSED ABDOMINAL SONOGRAPHY IN GRADING HEPATIC TRAUMA KEEPING CECT ABDOMEN AS GOLD STANDARD

Background: Hepatic trauma remains one of the most frequent and severe abdominal injuries associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in trauma care. Rapid, reliable, and non-invasive diagnostic approaches are essential to improve survival and guide treatment decisions. Focused Abdominal Sonography in Trauma (FAST) has emerged as a widely used bedside tool for detecting intra-abdominal injuries, yet its diagnostic accuracy compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), the gold standard, continues to be debated. Objective: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FAST in detecting and grading hepatic trauma, using CECT as the reference standard. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted over six months in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 130 patients aged over 18 years presenting with suspected hepatic trauma were enrolled through consecutive sampling. All patients underwent FAST examinations performed by trained emergency physicians, followed by CECT within 30–60 minutes. The diagnostic performance of FAST was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), overall accuracy, and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. The grading of hepatic trauma was performed according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Liver Injury Scale, with CECT interpretations blinded to FAST results. Results: FAST detected hepatic trauma with a sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 88.4%, PPV of 94.1%, NPV of 79.2%, and an overall accuracy of 88.5%. Substantial agreement was observed with CECT results (kappa coefficient = 0.77, p < 0.001). Concordance between FAST and CECT across injury grades was high, with agreement ranging from 83.3% in Grade V to 93.7% in Grade II injuries. Conclusion: FAST demonstrated strong diagnostic accuracy for hepatic trauma detection and grading, confirming its role as a reliable, rapid, and non-invasive assessment tool. However, reduced sensitivity in high-grade injuries highlights the continued need for complementary CECT evaluation in severe trauma. Standardized training and consistent protocols are recommended to optimize diagnostic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/23edtg42
Primary Topic
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF FOCUSED ABDOMINAL SONOGRAPHY IN GRADING HEPATIC TRAUMA KEEPING CECT ABDOMEN AS GOLD STANDARD

Qamar Mehboob, Saira Ahmed, Mamoon Rasheed, Aasma Shaheen et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
article

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF FOCUSED ABDOMINAL SONOGRAPHY IN GRADING HEPATIC TRAUMA KEEPING CECT ABDOMEN AS GOLD STANDARD

Qamar Mehboob, Saira Ahmed, Mamoon Rasheed, Aasma Shaheen, Saad Nadeem, Mohamad Iqbal
article en

Abstract

Background: Hepatic trauma remains one of the most frequent and severe abdominal injuries associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in trauma care. Rapid, reliable, and non-invasive diagnostic approaches are essential to improve survival and guide treatment decisions. Focused Abdominal Sonography in Trauma (FAST) has emerged as a widely used bedside tool for detecting intra-abdominal injuries, yet its diagnostic accuracy compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), the gold standard, continues to be debated. Objective: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FAST in detecting and grading hepatic trauma, using CECT as the reference standard. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted over six months in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 130 patients aged over 18 years presenting with suspected hepatic trauma were enrolled through consecutive sampling. All patients underwent FAST examinations performed by trained emergency physicians, followed by CECT within 30–60 minutes. The diagnostic performance of FAST was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), overall accuracy, and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. The grading of hepatic trauma was performed according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Liver Injury Scale, with CECT interpretations blinded to FAST results. Results: FAST detected hepatic trauma with a sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 88.4%, PPV of 94.1%, NPV of 79.2%, and an overall accuracy of 88.5%. Substantial agreement was observed with CECT results (kappa coefficient = 0.77, p < 0.001). Concordance between FAST and CECT across injury grades was high, with agreement ranging from 83.3% in Grade V to 93.7% in Grade II injuries. Conclusion: FAST demonstrated strong diagnostic accuracy for hepatic trauma detection and grading, confirming its role as a reliable, rapid, and non-invasive assessment tool. However, reduced sensitivity in high-grade injuries highlights the continued need for complementary CECT evaluation in severe trauma. Standardized training and consistent protocols are recommended to optimize diagnostic performance.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(5 (Health and Allied))
Rawalpindi Medical University (PK), Benazir Bhutto Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.