Net-zero sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production via CO2 hydrogenation in low-temperature Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Process design and alternatives

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is fundamental for decarbonizing the aviation sector, which remains one of the hardest industries to electrify. Among the available production routes, SAF derived from indirect CO₂ hydrogenation stands out as a promising alternative, delivering drop-in fuels compatible with existing infrastructure. This work presents and compares three thermally self-sufficient process alternatives for SAF production from captured CO₂, green hydrogen, and renewable electricity. The base case follows a conventional configuration consisting of Reverse Water Gas Shift (RWGS), Fischer-Tropsch (FT), hydrocracker, and Auto-Thermal Reformer (ATR) reactors. The first alternative replaces the ATR with two furnaces and substitutes the PSA-based CO₂ separation with an amine absorption unit. It also includes an isomerization bed to reduce SAF’s freezing point, a Dividing Wall Column (DWC) for efficient separation, and a steam turbine to recover part of the plant’s power demand. The second alternative retains the ATR while integrating CO₂ capture, the isomerization bed, and the DWC. The analysis shows that maintaining the ATR reactor reduces hydrogen consumption (0.52 kg H₂ per kg of products in the second alternative), being economically more favorable (3.65 €/L of SAF) than minimizing power consumption (716 kWh per ton of products in the first alternative), given the high cost of electrolytic hydrogen. In addition, the DWC proves to be the most efficient separation option, requiring the lowest reboiler duty and the fewest trays. All process configurations produce water as the only byproduct (approximately 3.3 kg H₂O/kg products), and achieve net-negative greenhouse gas emissions of up to −2 kg CO₂eq per kg of product. • Thermally self-sufficient SAF production powered by renewable electricity. • Complete conversion of CO₂ and H₂ into SAF and diesel-range hydrocarbons. • Net-zero fuels (-2 kgCO₂eq/kg) with water as the only byproduct. • Minimizing H₂ consumption improves economics more power reduction. • Dividing-wall column lowers number of trays and reboiler duty in separation step.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103225
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Net-zero sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production via CO2 hydrogenation in low-temperature Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Process design and alternatives

Diego Rego-Fernández, Luis Vaquerizo
4 citations
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
1.56
article

Net-zero sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production via CO2 hydrogenation in low-temperature Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Process design and alternatives

Diego Rego-Fernández, Luis Vaquerizo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is fundamental for decarbonizing the aviation sector, which remains one of the hardest industries to electrify. Among the available production routes, SAF derived from indirect CO₂ hydrogenation stands out as a promising alternative, delivering drop-in fuels compatible with existing infrastructure. This work presents and compares three thermally self-sufficient process alternatives for SAF production from captured CO₂, green hydrogen, and renewable electricity. The base case follows a conventional configuration consisting of Reverse Water Gas Shift (RWGS), Fischer-Tropsch (FT), hydrocracker, and Auto-Thermal Reformer (ATR) reactors. The first alternative replaces the ATR with two furnaces and substitutes the PSA-based CO₂ separation with an amine absorption unit. It also includes an isomerization bed to reduce SAF’s freezing point, a Dividing Wall Column (DWC) for efficient separation, and a steam turbine to recover part of the plant’s power demand. The second alternative retains the ATR while integrating CO₂ capture, the isomerization bed, and the DWC. The analysis shows that maintaining the ATR reactor reduces hydrogen consumption (0.52 kg H₂ per kg of products in the second alternative), being economically more favorable (3.65 €/L of SAF) than minimizing power consumption (716 kWh per ton of products in the first alternative), given the high cost of electrolytic hydrogen. In addition, the DWC proves to be the most efficient separation option, requiring the lowest reboiler duty and the fewest trays. All process configurations produce water as the only byproduct (approximately 3.3 kg H₂O/kg products), and achieve net-negative greenhouse gas emissions of up to −2 kg CO₂eq per kg of product. • Thermally self-sufficient SAF production powered by renewable electricity. • Complete conversion of CO₂ and H₂ into SAF and diesel-range hydrocarbons. • Net-zero fuels (-2 kgCO₂eq/kg) with water as the only byproduct. • Minimizing H₂ consumption improves economics more power reduction. • Dividing-wall column lowers number of trays and reboiler duty in separation step.

Journal of CO2 UtilizationVol. 102
Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.