Heterogeneous Effects of Farm and Nonfarm Income on Household Consumption Expenditure and Inequality

ABSTRACT This study examines the heterogeneous effects of farm income and nonfarm income on household consumption expenditure and consumption expenditure inequality, using data from the 2016 China Labor Force Dynamics Survey. A two‐stage residual inclusion model is employed to address the endogeneity of nonfarm income. Results show that nonfarm income plays a larger role in raising household consumption expenditure than farm income. Specifically, an increase of 1000 yuan in farm and nonfarm income raises household consumption expenditures by 134 and 215 yuan/capita, respectively. Furthermore, nonfarm income is associated with consumption expenditure inequality, while farm income is not. Disaggregated analyses show that nonfarm income has larger effects than farm income on expenditures on food, consumer goods, and transportation; the reverse is true for medical care and gift expenditures. These findings suggest that policies promoting nonfarm employment and supporting farm income growth can help improve rural household consumption while addressing consumption inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Development Economics
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70059
Primary Topic
Korean Urban and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneous Effects of Farm and Nonfarm Income on Household Consumption Expenditure and Inequality

Hongyun Zheng, Puneet Vatsa, Wanglin Ma
Review of Development Economics
Korean Urban and Social Studies
article

Heterogeneous Effects of Farm and Nonfarm Income on Household Consumption Expenditure and Inequality

Hongyun Zheng, Puneet Vatsa, Wanglin Ma
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the heterogeneous effects of farm income and nonfarm income on household consumption expenditure and consumption expenditure inequality, using data from the 2016 China Labor Force Dynamics Survey. A two‐stage residual inclusion model is employed to address the endogeneity of nonfarm income. Results show that nonfarm income plays a larger role in raising household consumption expenditure than farm income. Specifically, an increase of 1000 yuan in farm and nonfarm income raises household consumption expenditures by 134 and 215 yuan/capita, respectively. Furthermore, nonfarm income is associated with consumption expenditure inequality, while farm income is not. Disaggregated analyses show that nonfarm income has larger effects than farm income on expenditures on food, consumer goods, and transportation; the reverse is true for medical care and gift expenditures. These findings suggest that policies promoting nonfarm employment and supporting farm income growth can help improve rural household consumption while addressing consumption inequality.

Review of Development Economics
Lincoln University (NZ), Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Korean Urban and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.