National security evaluation and early warning system of petroleum resources in China

Amidst the constraints of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals (dual carbon) and high import dependence, safeguarding China's petroleum security faces intensified challenges. This study constructs a dynamic weight evaluation framework integrating four dimensions: "Availability", "Affordability", "Reliability", and "Sustainability". A multi-model earlywarning mechanism—combining AHP-based variable weights with eight algorithms (benchmark models: ARIMA, ETS; machine learning: BP neural network, SVM, RF; deep learning: CNN-LSTM, Transformer, N-BEATS)—is further developed. Key findings reveal: (1) Dynamic weighting identifies Availability and Reliability as core dimensions, with geopolitical risks and substitution dependence dominating security outcomes. Weight fluctuations (e.g., reserve-production ratio shifts of 6–7% driven by technology/resource cycles) demonstrate systemic adaptability. (2) The historical assessment (2000–2023) reveals that security levels progressed from an unsafe level (2.7 in 2000) to a moderately safe level (4.4 in 2023), exhibiting a pattern of fragile recovery. Periods of instability (2000–2013, 2021–2022) were associated with supply-demand imbalances, price volatility, and geopolitical shocks (e.g., Middle East turbulence, the COVID-19 pandemic). (3) CNN-LSTM projections (2025–2050) indicate security indices fluctuating between 4.4 and 4.6 under baseline scenarios, while Sustainability emerges as the primary risk source. Without policy intervention, indices under the low scenario (4.6 by 2050) will linger near the moderately safe threshold, facing significant downside risks. (4) Core vulnerabilities include high import dependence, reserve gaps, transport bottlenecks, price volatility, and delayed low-carbon substitution. Consequently, a tiered response policy system—activated by quantified security thresholds—is proposed to enhance petroleum industry resilience and advance dual carbon objectives. • Proposing a dynamic 4A framework for China's petroleum security assessment. • Developing a multi-model early-warning system with superior CNN-LSTM performance. • Revealing a fragile recovery pattern from unsafe to moderately safe. • Identifying sustainability as the future key risk and proposing tiered policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101899
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National security evaluation and early warning system of petroleum resources in China

Minggui Zheng, Ting Luo, Qi Li, Dong Juan
Energy Strategy Reviews
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

National security evaluation and early warning system of petroleum resources in China

Minggui Zheng, Ting Luo, Qi Li, Dong Juan
article en

Abstract

Amidst the constraints of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals (dual carbon) and high import dependence, safeguarding China's petroleum security faces intensified challenges. This study constructs a dynamic weight evaluation framework integrating four dimensions: "Availability", "Affordability", "Reliability", and "Sustainability". A multi-model earlywarning mechanism—combining AHP-based variable weights with eight algorithms (benchmark models: ARIMA, ETS; machine learning: BP neural network, SVM, RF; deep learning: CNN-LSTM, Transformer, N-BEATS)—is further developed. Key findings reveal: (1) Dynamic weighting identifies Availability and Reliability as core dimensions, with geopolitical risks and substitution dependence dominating security outcomes. Weight fluctuations (e.g., reserve-production ratio shifts of 6–7% driven by technology/resource cycles) demonstrate systemic adaptability. (2) The historical assessment (2000–2023) reveals that security levels progressed from an unsafe level (2.7 in 2000) to a moderately safe level (4.4 in 2023), exhibiting a pattern of fragile recovery. Periods of instability (2000–2013, 2021–2022) were associated with supply-demand imbalances, price volatility, and geopolitical shocks (e.g., Middle East turbulence, the COVID-19 pandemic). (3) CNN-LSTM projections (2025–2050) indicate security indices fluctuating between 4.4 and 4.6 under baseline scenarios, while Sustainability emerges as the primary risk source. Without policy intervention, indices under the low scenario (4.6 by 2050) will linger near the moderately safe threshold, facing significant downside risks. (4) Core vulnerabilities include high import dependence, reserve gaps, transport bottlenecks, price volatility, and delayed low-carbon substitution. Consequently, a tiered response policy system—activated by quantified security thresholds—is proposed to enhance petroleum industry resilience and advance dual carbon objectives. • Proposing a dynamic 4A framework for China's petroleum security assessment. • Developing a multi-model early-warning system with superior CNN-LSTM performance. • Revealing a fragile recovery pattern from unsafe to moderately safe. • Identifying sustainability as the future key risk and proposing tiered policies.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 62
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN), Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.