Indonesia’s Policy Response to Malaysian Cultural Claims (2007–2019)

This study analyzes Indonesian cultural policy from 2007 to 2019, focusing on implementation, public response, and its impact on international relations. Culture is positioned as strategic for identity, heritage awareness, and diplomacy. Using a qualitative descriptive-historical approach with written, visual, online, and interview sources, findings show that cultural claims encouraged both reactive and proactive measures. The government accelerated UNESCO registrations of Batik (2009), Angklung (2010), and Wayang (2003) to gain legitimacy. Legal frameworks were strengthened through Law No. 11/2010 on Cultural Heritage and Law No. 5/2017 on Cultural Advancement. Internationally, the Indonesian Cultural House (RBI) program became a soft power instrument, involving the diaspora and enhancing diplomacy. Hence, cultural claims act as both challenges and catalysts for sovereignty, regulation, and global cultural strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analisis Sejarah.
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25077/jas.v15i2.143
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indonesia’s Policy Response to Malaysian Cultural Claims (2007–2019)

Abrar Halim, Wannofri Samry, Anatona Anatona
Analisis Sejarah.
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Indonesia’s Policy Response to Malaysian Cultural Claims (2007–2019)

Abrar Halim, Wannofri Samry, Anatona Anatona
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes Indonesian cultural policy from 2007 to 2019, focusing on implementation, public response, and its impact on international relations. Culture is positioned as strategic for identity, heritage awareness, and diplomacy. Using a qualitative descriptive-historical approach with written, visual, online, and interview sources, findings show that cultural claims encouraged both reactive and proactive measures. The government accelerated UNESCO registrations of Batik (2009), Angklung (2010), and Wayang (2003) to gain legitimacy. Legal frameworks were strengthened through Law No. 11/2010 on Cultural Heritage and Law No. 5/2017 on Cultural Advancement. Internationally, the Indonesian Cultural House (RBI) program became a soft power instrument, involving the diaspora and enhancing diplomacy. Hence, cultural claims act as both challenges and catalysts for sovereignty, regulation, and global cultural strategy.

Analisis Sejarah.Vol. 15(2)
Andalas University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.