Green chemistry meets theoretical chemistry – comparison of 24 quantum chemical methods for calculating NMR shielding constants using the RGB model

The idea of green chemistry has already found many recipients, but not yet among computational chemists. Although theoretical methods indeed do not use chemical reagents and do not produce laboratory waste, due to the complexity of calculations they often require a lot of energy and can generate a significant carbon footprint. In our opinion, the basic question is not “Should we take into account the carbon footprint of computational methods in their assessment?”, but “How to do it properly?” In this work, we have attempted to address this issue by using an RGB model, a well-known tool used for assessing analytical chemistry methods, that has been adapted to the specifics of computational chemistry (RGB_in-silico). The model uses three primary parameters: the calculation error (red), the carbon footprint resulting from the energy consumption of the computer (green), and the computation time (blue). In phase I, acceptability thresholds are adopted. Methods that are unacceptable in at least one aspect are rejected. In phase II methods are comprehensively compared in terms of “whiteness”. The model was validated on 24 quantum chemical methods for calculating NMR shielding constants, differing in functionals and basis sets. The obtained results indicate a huge discrepancy between the methods, and therefore, the need to use a dedicated tool for selecting the optimal one in a rational way. The large values of the carbon footprint clearly indicate that some computational methods cannot be considered as “green in nature”. The RGB_in-silico model seems to be a simple and useful metric. • Green chemistry applies both to laboratory and computational methods. • Computer calculations generate a varied carbon footprint which needs to be analyzed. • Most accurate methods can be time-inefficient and energy-intensive. • The use of a dedicated metric is recommended. • The RGB_in-silico model allows one to compare theoretical chemistry methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2025.102215
Primary Topic
Free Radicals and Antioxidants
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green chemistry meets theoretical chemistry – comparison of 24 quantum chemical methods for calculating NMR shielding constants using the RGB model

Paweł Mateusz Nowak, Dariusz Maciej Pisklak, Łukasz Szeleszczuk
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
Free Radicals and Antioxidants
article

Green chemistry meets theoretical chemistry – comparison of 24 quantum chemical methods for calculating NMR shielding constants using the RGB model

Paweł Mateusz Nowak, Dariusz Maciej Pisklak, Łukasz Szeleszczuk
article en

Abstract

The idea of green chemistry has already found many recipients, but not yet among computational chemists. Although theoretical methods indeed do not use chemical reagents and do not produce laboratory waste, due to the complexity of calculations they often require a lot of energy and can generate a significant carbon footprint. In our opinion, the basic question is not “Should we take into account the carbon footprint of computational methods in their assessment?”, but “How to do it properly?” In this work, we have attempted to address this issue by using an RGB model, a well-known tool used for assessing analytical chemistry methods, that has been adapted to the specifics of computational chemistry (RGB_in-silico). The model uses three primary parameters: the calculation error (red), the carbon footprint resulting from the energy consumption of the computer (green), and the computation time (blue). In phase I, acceptability thresholds are adopted. Methods that are unacceptable in at least one aspect are rejected. In phase II methods are comprehensively compared in terms of “whiteness”. The model was validated on 24 quantum chemical methods for calculating NMR shielding constants, differing in functionals and basis sets. The obtained results indicate a huge discrepancy between the methods, and therefore, the need to use a dedicated tool for selecting the optimal one in a rational way. The large values of the carbon footprint clearly indicate that some computational methods cannot be considered as “green in nature”. The RGB_in-silico model seems to be a simple and useful metric. • Green chemistry applies both to laboratory and computational methods. • Computer calculations generate a varied carbon footprint which needs to be analyzed. • Most accurate methods can be time-inefficient and energy-intensive. • The use of a dedicated metric is recommended. • The RGB_in-silico model allows one to compare theoretical chemistry methods.

Sustainable Chemistry and PharmacyVol. 48
Jagiellonian University (PL), Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
Narodowym Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Free Radicals and Antioxidants
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.