Survey on Real Estate and Stock Market Crashes in China During the Pandemic<br>—A Comparative Analysis of Information-Gathering and Investment Decisions in Beijing and Tianjin

The shocks of COVID-19 severely impacted China’s housing and equity markets, revealing deep information gaps. A survey of 115 respondents in Beijing (Tier 1) and Tianjin (generally classified as a Tier 2 city in terms of economic dynamism and information accessibility) showed that investors engaged in extensive information-seeking behaviors but exhibited significant distrust toward official channels and, retrospectively perceived inadequate information access. Widespread regret was observed: 81% indicated they would have changed past property choices; while 97% believed that better intelligence could have reduced stock losses. The majority of market participants have reduced their engagement in both markets. The evidence from the literature on Chinese market opacity suggests that inadequate disclosure practices and limited investor protection mechanisms are crisis accelerants. The restoration of public confidence demands fuller transparency, stronger safeguards, and wide-reaching financial education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Risk Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2025.143018
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey on Real Estate and Stock Market Crashes in China During the Pandemic<br>&#8212;A Comparative Analysis of Information-Gathering and Investment Decisions in Beijing and Tianjin

Yinglin Zhu
Journal of Financial Risk Management
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

Survey on Real Estate and Stock Market Crashes in China During the Pandemic<br>&#8212;A Comparative Analysis of Information-Gathering and Investment Decisions in Beijing and Tianjin

Yinglin Zhu
article en

Abstract

The shocks of COVID-19 severely impacted China’s housing and equity markets, revealing deep information gaps. A survey of 115 respondents in Beijing (Tier 1) and Tianjin (generally classified as a Tier 2 city in terms of economic dynamism and information accessibility) showed that investors engaged in extensive information-seeking behaviors but exhibited significant distrust toward official channels and, retrospectively perceived inadequate information access. Widespread regret was observed: 81% indicated they would have changed past property choices; while 97% believed that better intelligence could have reduced stock losses. The majority of market participants have reduced their engagement in both markets. The evidence from the literature on Chinese market opacity suggests that inadequate disclosure practices and limited investor protection mechanisms are crisis accelerants. The restoration of public confidence demands fuller transparency, stronger safeguards, and wide-reaching financial education.

Journal of Financial Risk ManagementVol. 14(03)
Tianjin Academy of Fine Arts (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.