Quality of Decision-making at Oncology Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: A Structured Observational Study

Evaluating MDMs using a validated tool provides valuable insights into decision-making quality across MDMs. There was a consistent high standard of comprehensive medical information presented, but team contributions varied and psychosocial issues, comorbidities and patient preferences were less well considered. These findings provide an opportunity for offering feedback to MDMs, facilitating the identification of potential interventions to improve the quality of decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2025.103942
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Decision-making at Oncology Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: A Structured Observational Study

Shalini Vinod, Jana Yanga, Sarah Avery, Jesmin Shafiq et al.
2 citations
Clinical Oncology
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
2.72
article

Quality of Decision-making at Oncology Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: A Structured Observational Study

Shalini Vinod, Jana Yanga, Sarah Avery, Jesmin Shafiq, Yu Xuan Koo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Evaluating MDMs using a validated tool provides valuable insights into decision-making quality across MDMs. There was a consistent high standard of comprehensive medical information presented, but team contributions varied and psychosocial issues, comorbidities and patient preferences were less well considered. These findings provide an opportunity for offering feedback to MDMs, facilitating the identification of potential interventions to improve the quality of decision-making.

Clinical OncologyVol. 47
Ingham Institute (AU), South Western Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.