Rotating visual spaces induce behavioral biases consistent with recalibrated heading integration in humans

Organisms from flies to mice to humans maintain an internal representation of heading by integrating their movements across time. To avoid compounding errors, this integration must be precisely calibrated. Recent evidence from rodents indicates that this calibration is inherently plastic, as immersion in rotating visual spaces induces a bias in neural heading integration that outlasts that experience. Here, we show that humans also exhibit behavioral biases consistent with recalibrated heading integration under similar circumstances. Leveraging immersive virtual reality, we find that rotating visual spaces biases human heading judgements for up to minutes following the experience. The direction of the bias matches the direction of the rotation, while the magnitude scales with its speed. Trials with more head movement accrue more bias. Visual motion alone is sufficient to induce a bias. These results are consistent with the plastic recalibration of human heading integration by rotating visual spaces, mirroring neural findings in rodents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113602
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rotating visual spaces induce behavioral biases consistent with recalibrated heading integration in humans

Alexandra T. Keinath, David W. Green, David G. Behery, Viktor H. Klimczyk et al.
iScience
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

Rotating visual spaces induce behavioral biases consistent with recalibrated heading integration in humans

Alexandra T. Keinath, David W. Green, David G. Behery, Viktor H. Klimczyk, Michael Pigin
article en

Abstract

Organisms from flies to mice to humans maintain an internal representation of heading by integrating their movements across time. To avoid compounding errors, this integration must be precisely calibrated. Recent evidence from rodents indicates that this calibration is inherently plastic, as immersion in rotating visual spaces induces a bias in neural heading integration that outlasts that experience. Here, we show that humans also exhibit behavioral biases consistent with recalibrated heading integration under similar circumstances. Leveraging immersive virtual reality, we find that rotating visual spaces biases human heading judgements for up to minutes following the experience. The direction of the bias matches the direction of the rotation, while the magnitude scales with its speed. Trials with more head movement accrue more bias. Visual motion alone is sufficient to induce a bias. These results are consistent with the plastic recalibration of human heading integration by rotating visual spaces, mirroring neural findings in rodents.

iScienceVol. 28(10)
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rotating visual spaces induce behavioral biases consistent with recalibrated heading integration in humans — Alexandra T. Keinath, David W. Green, et al. · iScience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS