Synthetic oil production: Process design, techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment

• Synthetic oil production routes via coal, natural gas, and biomass are compared. • MSP for synthetic oil from coal, natural gas, biomass $1,088.9, $1,413.4, $1,437.7/ton. • GWP per kg synthetic oil from coal, natural gas, biomass 9.75, 12.30, -2.79 kg CO 2 eq. • The investment risk of the three routes is studied via Monte Carlo simulations. • The potential of replacing fossil fuels with biomass to produce synthetic oils is discussed. The transition from fossil fuels to renewable resources in synthetic oil production is a critical step towards mitigating environmental impacts and achieving sustainability goals. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of replacing fossil fuels with biomass in the production of synthetic oils through a comprehensive analysis encompassing conceptual process design, techno-economic analysis, and life cycle assessment. We examine three primary routes for producing synthetic oil: natural gas to liquid (GTL), coal to liquid (CTL), and biomass to liquid (BTL). Techno-economic analysis results reveal that the CTL process has the best economic performance with a minimum selling price of synthetic oil at $1,088.9/t, followed by the GTL process at $1,413.4/t, and the BTL process at $1,437.7/t. Life cycle assessment results underscore the environmental advantages of the BTL process, particularly its efficacy in reducing greenhouse gas emissions (-2.79 kg CO 2 equiv./kg synthetic oil). In contrast, the CTL and GTL processes produce 1 kg of synthetic oil with emissions of 9.75 and 12.30 kg CO 2 equivalent, respectively. The environmental benefits of the BTL process highlight its potential for replacing GTL and CTL. In addition, the analysis found that when the prices of coal and natural gas fluctuate by 50%, and the price of wood chips is 57.95% (-8.55% to +25.66%) and 65.43% (-0.61% to 1.82%) lower than that of coal and natural gas, respectively, the BTL process has the potential to economically outperform CTL and GTL, particularly with the implementation of active policies related to non-renewable energy use and carbon emissions ( e.g. , carbon taxes, renewable energy incentives).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107416
Primary Topic
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthetic oil production: Process design, techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment

Guorui Fan, Yuqiu Chen, Xiaoqin Wu, Xinyan Liu et al.
Results in Engineering
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
article

Synthetic oil production: Process design, techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment

Guorui Fan, Yuqiu Chen, Xiaoqin Wu, Xinyan Liu, Yang Lei
article en

Abstract

• Synthetic oil production routes via coal, natural gas, and biomass are compared. • MSP for synthetic oil from coal, natural gas, biomass $1,088.9, $1,413.4, $1,437.7/ton. • GWP per kg synthetic oil from coal, natural gas, biomass 9.75, 12.30, -2.79 kg CO 2 eq. • The investment risk of the three routes is studied via Monte Carlo simulations. • The potential of replacing fossil fuels with biomass to produce synthetic oils is discussed. The transition from fossil fuels to renewable resources in synthetic oil production is a critical step towards mitigating environmental impacts and achieving sustainability goals. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of replacing fossil fuels with biomass in the production of synthetic oils through a comprehensive analysis encompassing conceptual process design, techno-economic analysis, and life cycle assessment. We examine three primary routes for producing synthetic oil: natural gas to liquid (GTL), coal to liquid (CTL), and biomass to liquid (BTL). Techno-economic analysis results reveal that the CTL process has the best economic performance with a minimum selling price of synthetic oil at $1,088.9/t, followed by the GTL process at $1,413.4/t, and the BTL process at $1,437.7/t. Life cycle assessment results underscore the environmental advantages of the BTL process, particularly its efficacy in reducing greenhouse gas emissions (-2.79 kg CO 2 equiv./kg synthetic oil). In contrast, the CTL and GTL processes produce 1 kg of synthetic oil with emissions of 9.75 and 12.30 kg CO 2 equivalent, respectively. The environmental benefits of the BTL process highlight its potential for replacing GTL and CTL. In addition, the analysis found that when the prices of coal and natural gas fluctuate by 50%, and the price of wood chips is 57.95% (-8.55% to +25.66%) and 65.43% (-0.61% to 1.82%) lower than that of coal and natural gas, respectively, the BTL process has the potential to economically outperform CTL and GTL, particularly with the implementation of active policies related to non-renewable energy use and carbon emissions ( e.g. , carbon taxes, renewable energy incentives).

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN), University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.