Identifying active ingredients and uptake patterns in the implementation of an AI-based writing support tool: Insights from a randomized controlled trial

While AI-based educational technologies offer many features designed to support learning, it remains unclear which specific components actually contribute to improved student outcomes. Identifying these active ingredients —the subset of an intervention’s core components that are demonstrably associated with learning gains—is essential. Yet, evidence from experimental studies remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from the treatment group of a randomized controlled trial involving 902 middle school students across three U.S. school districts who used MI Write , an automated writing evaluation (AWE) system. Drawing on implementation science, we examined which core components of MI Write—and which uptake patterns—were most strongly associated with student outcomes. Hierarchical linear modeling identified the amount of writing and revisions completed within MI Write as active ingredients, as both were significantly associated with improvements in students’ argumentative writing performance. However, uptake of these active ingredients varied across districts, with greater engagement correlating with improved outcomes in one district. Student-level factors—such as baseline writing performance, perceptions of teacher caring, and demographic characteristics—influenced writing task completion and revisions, while teacher-level factors primarily explained variability in writing task completion. These findings emphasize the importance of reaching specific uptake benchmarks in writing and revision to optimize AWE’s impact. Furthermore, fostering positive classroom climates may enhance engagement, particularly among underserved student populations. This study advances the understanding of AWE’s active ingredients and contextual dependencies, offering actionable insights for improving the design, implementation, and scalability of AI-based writing support tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100479
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying active ingredients and uptake patterns in the implementation of an AI-based writing support tool: Insights from a randomized controlled trial

Joshua Wilson, Corey Palermo, Huang Yue
1 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Identifying active ingredients and uptake patterns in the implementation of an AI-based writing support tool: Insights from a randomized controlled trial

Joshua Wilson, Corey Palermo, Huang Yue
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While AI-based educational technologies offer many features designed to support learning, it remains unclear which specific components actually contribute to improved student outcomes. Identifying these active ingredients —the subset of an intervention’s core components that are demonstrably associated with learning gains—is essential. Yet, evidence from experimental studies remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from the treatment group of a randomized controlled trial involving 902 middle school students across three U.S. school districts who used MI Write , an automated writing evaluation (AWE) system. Drawing on implementation science, we examined which core components of MI Write—and which uptake patterns—were most strongly associated with student outcomes. Hierarchical linear modeling identified the amount of writing and revisions completed within MI Write as active ingredients, as both were significantly associated with improvements in students’ argumentative writing performance. However, uptake of these active ingredients varied across districts, with greater engagement correlating with improved outcomes in one district. Student-level factors—such as baseline writing performance, perceptions of teacher caring, and demographic characteristics—influenced writing task completion and revisions, while teacher-level factors primarily explained variability in writing task completion. These findings emphasize the importance of reaching specific uptake benchmarks in writing and revision to optimize AWE’s impact. Furthermore, fostering positive classroom climates may enhance engagement, particularly among underserved student populations. This study advances the understanding of AWE’s active ingredients and contextual dependencies, offering actionable insights for improving the design, implementation, and scalability of AI-based writing support tools.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 9
University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.