How Morphology, Context, Vocabulary and Reading Shape Lexical Inference in Typical and Dyslexic Readers

Children’s ability to infer meanings of unfamiliar words during reading is thought to rely on the interplay between decoding, morphological awareness, contextual support, and vocabulary knowledge, but it remains unclear how these sources operate in typically developing (TD) readers compared to those with developmental dyslexia (DD). This study examined whether morphological cues (suffixes) or/and contextual information facilitate meaning inference and which variables predict performance. Sixty children (30 TD, 30 DD; aged 9–12) completed a battery of tasks assessing pseudoword decoding, expressive vocabulary (breadth) synonyms, antonyms (depth), morphological awareness (deriving and decomposing words), and reading comprehension. The main inference task consisted of 20 short stories in which pseudowords replaced target words; in half the stories, pseudowords included derivational suffixes, while in the other half no such clues were available. Results showed that TD children performed significantly better than DD peers across all tasks. Regression analyses revealed that vocabulary depth and morphological awareness predicted inferencing in both groups, but decoding was uniquely predictive for DD children and reading comprehension only for TD children. These findings suggest that while lexical inference in both groups appears to draw on vocabulary and morphology, TD children may additionally integrate higher-order comprehension, whereas DD children seem to remain more influenced by decoding and partial lexical cues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101266
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Morphology, Context, Vocabulary and Reading Shape Lexical Inference in Typical and Dyslexic Readers

Ifigeneia Dosi
Education Sciences
Reading and Literacy Development
article

How Morphology, Context, Vocabulary and Reading Shape Lexical Inference in Typical and Dyslexic Readers

Ifigeneia Dosi
article en

Abstract

Children’s ability to infer meanings of unfamiliar words during reading is thought to rely on the interplay between decoding, morphological awareness, contextual support, and vocabulary knowledge, but it remains unclear how these sources operate in typically developing (TD) readers compared to those with developmental dyslexia (DD). This study examined whether morphological cues (suffixes) or/and contextual information facilitate meaning inference and which variables predict performance. Sixty children (30 TD, 30 DD; aged 9–12) completed a battery of tasks assessing pseudoword decoding, expressive vocabulary (breadth) synonyms, antonyms (depth), morphological awareness (deriving and decomposing words), and reading comprehension. The main inference task consisted of 20 short stories in which pseudowords replaced target words; in half the stories, pseudowords included derivational suffixes, while in the other half no such clues were available. Results showed that TD children performed significantly better than DD peers across all tasks. Regression analyses revealed that vocabulary depth and morphological awareness predicted inferencing in both groups, but decoding was uniquely predictive for DD children and reading comprehension only for TD children. These findings suggest that while lexical inference in both groups appears to draw on vocabulary and morphology, TD children may additionally integrate higher-order comprehension, whereas DD children seem to remain more influenced by decoding and partial lexical cues.

Education SciencesVol. 15(10)
Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.