Modeling Firebrand Spotting in WRF-Fire for Coupled Fire–Weather Prediction

This study develops, implements, and evaluates the Firebrand Spotting parameterization within the WRF-Fire coupled fire–atmosphere modeling system. Fire spotting is an important mechanism characterizing fire spread in wind-driven events. It can accelerate the rate of spread and enable the fire to spread over streams and barriers such as highways. Without the capability to simulate fire spotting, wind-driven fire simulations cannot accurately represent fire behavior. In the Firebrand Spotting parameterization, firebrands are generated with a set of fixed properties, from locations vertically aligned with the leading fire line. Firebrands are transported using a Lagrangian framework accounting for particle burnout (combustion) through an MPI-compatible implementation within WRF-Fire. Fire spots may occur when firebrands land on unburned grid points. The parameterization is verified through idealized simulations and its application is demonstrated for the 2021 Marshall Fire, Colorado. The simulations are assessed using the observed fire perimeter and time of arrival at multiple locations identified from social media footage and official documents. All simulations using a range of ignition thresholds outperform the control without spotting. Simulations accounting for fire spots show more accurate fire arrival times (i.e., reflecting a better fire rate of spread), despite producing a generally larger fire area. The Heidke Skill Score (Cohen’s Kappa) for the burn area ranges between 0.62 and 0.78 for simulations with fire spots compared to 0.47 for the control. These results show that the parameterization consistently improves the fire forecast verification metrics, while also underscoring future work priorities, including advancing the generation and ignition components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8100374
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Firebrand Spotting in WRF-Fire for Coupled Fire–Weather Prediction

Hamed Ebrahimian, Timothy W. Juliano, Jason C. Knievel, Kasra Shamsaei et al.
1 citations
Fire
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
article

Modeling Firebrand Spotting in WRF-Fire for Coupled Fire–Weather Prediction

Hamed Ebrahimian, Timothy W. Juliano, Jason C. Knievel, Kasra Shamsaei, Maria Frediani, Branko Kosović, Sarah A. Tessendorf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study develops, implements, and evaluates the Firebrand Spotting parameterization within the WRF-Fire coupled fire–atmosphere modeling system. Fire spotting is an important mechanism characterizing fire spread in wind-driven events. It can accelerate the rate of spread and enable the fire to spread over streams and barriers such as highways. Without the capability to simulate fire spotting, wind-driven fire simulations cannot accurately represent fire behavior. In the Firebrand Spotting parameterization, firebrands are generated with a set of fixed properties, from locations vertically aligned with the leading fire line. Firebrands are transported using a Lagrangian framework accounting for particle burnout (combustion) through an MPI-compatible implementation within WRF-Fire. Fire spots may occur when firebrands land on unburned grid points. The parameterization is verified through idealized simulations and its application is demonstrated for the 2021 Marshall Fire, Colorado. The simulations are assessed using the observed fire perimeter and time of arrival at multiple locations identified from social media footage and official documents. All simulations using a range of ignition thresholds outperform the control without spotting. Simulations accounting for fire spots show more accurate fire arrival times (i.e., reflecting a better fire rate of spread), despite producing a generally larger fire area. The Heidke Skill Score (Cohen’s Kappa) for the burn area ranges between 0.62 and 0.78 for simulations with fire spots compared to 0.47 for the control. These results show that the parameterization consistently improves the fire forecast verification metrics, while also underscoring future work priorities, including advancing the generation and ignition components.

FireVol. 8(10)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), University of Nevada, Reno (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
National Science Foundation, Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.