PECULIARITIES OF THE APPLICATION OF TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

Under the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, justice is administered by the courts. It is the court's decision that is the act of administering justice, which is adopted after a full and complete assessment of the evidence gathered and examined in the case, providing a reasoned response to the arguments of the parties, and resolving the legal dispute that arose. However, a considerable period may elapse before a judgment is given in a case, and it is therefore necessary to provide for the interim measures in court proceedings in order to ensure that the future execution of the judgment is not impeded. These interim measures are intended to temporarily regulate or "freeze" the situation to ensure that the future judgment (and thus justice) is actually carried out. One of the fundamental principles of civil procedure - access to justice and the right to due process of law - establishes not only the State's obligation to ensure the protection of the subject's substantive rights and access to justice, but also to guarantee the enforcement of the judgment rendered in civil proceedings, as the defence of a person's violated rights must be not only effective but also realistic. Interim measures of protection and measures to secure claims are, in their essence, a temporary mechanism for the settlement of a disputed situation, which is applied on the legal grounds laid down by law in order to ensure that a future judgment can be enforced in practice. They are not to be understood as a remedy for the protection of a substantive legal relationship, since they merely provide procedural protection of a temporary nature, normally lasting until the judgment is enforced. They are 'provisional' in nature, as they can be modified or revoked and normally expire once the judicial dispute has been finally settled. The principles of legal equality, economy of proceedings, fairness and other principles of judicial procedure are important in deciding whether to grant interim measures of protection or interim measures of security or not. The article presents the grounds for the application of interim measures of protection (security measures) both in civil and administrative court proceedings, the specifics, the main procedural peculiarities and problems of this type of procedural issues in both civil and administrative court proceedings, as well as conclusions.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38104/vadyba.2025.2.06
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PECULIARITIES OF THE APPLICATION OF TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

1 citations
Journal of Management
Legal Studies and Reforms
8.52
article

PECULIARITIES OF THE APPLICATION OF TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Under the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, justice is administered by the courts. It is the court's decision that is the act of administering justice, which is adopted after a full and complete assessment of the evidence gathered and examined in the case, providing a reasoned response to the arguments of the parties, and resolving the legal dispute that arose. However, a considerable period may elapse before a judgment is given in a case, and it is therefore necessary to provide for the interim measures in court proceedings in order to ensure that the future execution of the judgment is not impeded. These interim measures are intended to temporarily regulate or "freeze" the situation to ensure that the future judgment (and thus justice) is actually carried out. One of the fundamental principles of civil procedure - access to justice and the right to due process of law - establishes not only the State's obligation to ensure the protection of the subject's substantive rights and access to justice, but also to guarantee the enforcement of the judgment rendered in civil proceedings, as the defence of a person's violated rights must be not only effective but also realistic. Interim measures of protection and measures to secure claims are, in their essence, a temporary mechanism for the settlement of a disputed situation, which is applied on the legal grounds laid down by law in order to ensure that a future judgment can be enforced in practice. They are not to be understood as a remedy for the protection of a substantive legal relationship, since they merely provide procedural protection of a temporary nature, normally lasting until the judgment is enforced. They are 'provisional' in nature, as they can be modified or revoked and normally expire once the judicial dispute has been finally settled. The principles of legal equality, economy of proceedings, fairness and other principles of judicial procedure are important in deciding whether to grant interim measures of protection or interim measures of security or not. The article presents the grounds for the application of interim measures of protection (security measures) both in civil and administrative court proceedings, the specifics, the main procedural peculiarities and problems of this type of procedural issues in both civil and administrative court proceedings, as well as conclusions.

Journal of ManagementVol. 41(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Legal Studies and Reforms
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.