Hospice Social Worker and Nurse Perceptions of the Usability of a Hospice Live Discharge Protocol (LDP)

BackgroundLive discharges from hospice are often distressing for patients, caregivers, and hospice providers alike, disrupting care continuity and leading to emotional and logistical challenges. Despite Medicare's discharge planning requirement, no standardized process currently exists for hospice-initiated discharges, resulting in variable quality of care transitions. In response, a Live Discharge Protocol (LDP) was developed; however, the usability of this protocol in practice has not been evaluated.MethodsPurposive, convenience sampling occurred over 1 month. Participants were hospice social workers (n = 10), and hospice nurses (n = 10) recruited through professional networks and social media. Open-ended survey questions were used, and data was analyzed using conventional content analysis.ResultsAcross all four steps of the LDP, no concerns with the clarity of language, instructions, and flow of the LDP were reported; however, challenges in implementation were noted across steps. Specifically, collaboration with team members and having clear roles, managing the logistics of discharge, supporting the patient/caregiver reactions to the discharge, and incorporating a new practice into existing work structure.ConclusionsAn explicit Live Discharge Protocol has strong potential to enhance the quality and consistency of a live discharge from hospice care. The LDP provides a framework to help smooth the transition from hospice care and provides patients and families with post-discharge support. Feedback from hospice professionals affirmed the relevance and usability of each step within the LDP, while also identifying opportunities for refinement for future implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251383107
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hospice Social Worker and Nurse Perceptions of the Usability of a Hospice Live Discharge Protocol (LDP)

Susan Enguídanos, Stephanie P. Wladkowski, Tracy Schroepfer
1 citations
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.88
article

Hospice Social Worker and Nurse Perceptions of the Usability of a Hospice Live Discharge Protocol (LDP)

Susan Enguídanos, Stephanie P. Wladkowski, Tracy Schroepfer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundLive discharges from hospice are often distressing for patients, caregivers, and hospice providers alike, disrupting care continuity and leading to emotional and logistical challenges. Despite Medicare's discharge planning requirement, no standardized process currently exists for hospice-initiated discharges, resulting in variable quality of care transitions. In response, a Live Discharge Protocol (LDP) was developed; however, the usability of this protocol in practice has not been evaluated.MethodsPurposive, convenience sampling occurred over 1 month. Participants were hospice social workers (n = 10), and hospice nurses (n = 10) recruited through professional networks and social media. Open-ended survey questions were used, and data was analyzed using conventional content analysis.ResultsAcross all four steps of the LDP, no concerns with the clarity of language, instructions, and flow of the LDP were reported; however, challenges in implementation were noted across steps. Specifically, collaboration with team members and having clear roles, managing the logistics of discharge, supporting the patient/caregiver reactions to the discharge, and incorporating a new practice into existing work structure.ConclusionsAn explicit Live Discharge Protocol has strong potential to enhance the quality and consistency of a live discharge from hospice care. The LDP provides a framework to help smooth the transition from hospice care and provides patients and families with post-discharge support. Feedback from hospice professionals affirmed the relevance and usability of each step within the LDP, while also identifying opportunities for refinement for future implementation.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Bowling Green State University (US), University of California System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.