Objectification of complaints of patients dissatisfied with the result of direct aesthetic restoration of teeth

Today, patients place special emphasis on the aesthetic component of dental treatment. Modern patients are well-informed about the possibilities of aesthetic dentistry and strive to receive high-tech treatment. However, even high-quality artistic dental restorations do not always meet patients’ requirements and expectations, thus disappointing them. To maximize patient satisfaction, a dentist must not only master modern treatment techniques but also take into account the patient’s wishes and motivation for aesthetic smile zone correction. Objective. Study the number and structure of complaints from patients dissatisfied with the results of aesthetic treatment. To evaluate the quality of restorations according to the FDI criteria using additional equipment. Material and methods. A sociological study was conducted to assess the opinions of 1000 patients regarding their satisfaction with the results of aesthetic dental restorations. As a result, we identified a group of patients who were dissatisfied with the quality of treatment. In order to objectify the complaints of this group of patients, we conducted clinical and instrumental examinations according to FDI criteria. Results. According to our research, a fairly large number of patients complain about poorly performed aesthetic treatment. In this situation, the dentist must comprehensively assess the quality of aesthetic restoration. In most cases, patients’ complaints are objective and correction of treatment results is necessary. However, there is a category of patients who are inclined to make unfounded complaints about the results of aesthetic treatment against the background of high-quality work performed by a dentist. It should be borne in mind that carrying out corrective measures to increase the satisfaction of such patients with the results of treatment will not lead to the desired result, and the reasons for dissatisfaction of such patients have nothing to do with the quality of the treatment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat2025180315
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objectification of complaints of patients dissatisfied with the result of direct aesthetic restoration of teeth

N. I. Krikheli, A.D. Moiseeva
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Medical and Biological Sciences
article

Objectification of complaints of patients dissatisfied with the result of direct aesthetic restoration of teeth

N. I. Krikheli, A.D. Moiseeva
article en

Abstract

Today, patients place special emphasis on the aesthetic component of dental treatment. Modern patients are well-informed about the possibilities of aesthetic dentistry and strive to receive high-tech treatment. However, even high-quality artistic dental restorations do not always meet patients’ requirements and expectations, thus disappointing them. To maximize patient satisfaction, a dentist must not only master modern treatment techniques but also take into account the patient’s wishes and motivation for aesthetic smile zone correction. Objective. Study the number and structure of complaints from patients dissatisfied with the results of aesthetic treatment. To evaluate the quality of restorations according to the FDI criteria using additional equipment. Material and methods. A sociological study was conducted to assess the opinions of 1000 patients regarding their satisfaction with the results of aesthetic dental restorations. As a result, we identified a group of patients who were dissatisfied with the quality of treatment. In order to objectify the complaints of this group of patients, we conducted clinical and instrumental examinations according to FDI criteria. Results. According to our research, a fairly large number of patients complain about poorly performed aesthetic treatment. In this situation, the dentist must comprehensively assess the quality of aesthetic restoration. In most cases, patients’ complaints are objective and correction of treatment results is necessary. However, there is a category of patients who are inclined to make unfounded complaints about the results of aesthetic treatment against the background of high-quality work performed by a dentist. It should be borne in mind that carrying out corrective measures to increase the satisfaction of such patients with the results of treatment will not lead to the desired result, and the reasons for dissatisfaction of such patients have nothing to do with the quality of the treatment.

Russian Journal of StomatologyVol. 18(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Medical and Biological Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Objectification of complaints of patients dissatisfied with the result of direct aesthetic restoration of teeth — N. I. Krikheli, A.D. Moiseeva · Russian Journal of Stomatology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS