Evaluation of the influence of different methods of processing three types of dental implant surfaces on their morphology and elemental composition in the treatment of peri-implantitis

Objective. To investigate changes in the morphological structure and elemental composition of dental implants with three types of surface (TiO2, SLA, RBM) after treatment with various methods — Er, Cr: YSGG laser with a wavelength of 2780 nm, Air Flow with erythritol and Vector Paro ultrasound device. Material and methods. A total of 36 dental implants were included: 9 new implants (3 of each surface type) were used as the control group, and 27 implants, explanted from patients with peri-implantitis, were evenly divided into three subgroups according to the cleaning method used. Surface morphology was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and elemental composition was analyzed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Results. Laser treatment demonstrated versatility and cleaning efficiency without damaging the microrelief for all types of surfaces. The Air Flow air-abrasive method was most effective for the RBM surface, but showed residual surface contamination when treated with TiO2 and SLA. The ultrasonic method using the Vector Paro device was especially effective for the TiO2 surface, probably due to its hydrophilic properties. Conclusion. The choice of decontamination method for the treatment of peri-implantitis should take into account the surface type and characteristics of the dental implant. The Er, Cr:YSGG laser proved to be a universal and effective method, while Air Flow and Vector Paro were more efficient when used for specific surface types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20251803126
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the influence of different methods of processing three types of dental implant surfaces on their morphology and elemental composition in the treatment of peri-implantitis

Taras V. Furtsev, A. V. Shabanov, Maksim V. Sokolov
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Evaluation of the influence of different methods of processing three types of dental implant surfaces on their morphology and elemental composition in the treatment of peri-implantitis

Taras V. Furtsev, A. V. Shabanov, Maksim V. Sokolov
article en

Abstract

Objective. To investigate changes in the morphological structure and elemental composition of dental implants with three types of surface (TiO2, SLA, RBM) after treatment with various methods — Er, Cr: YSGG laser with a wavelength of 2780 nm, Air Flow with erythritol and Vector Paro ultrasound device. Material and methods. A total of 36 dental implants were included: 9 new implants (3 of each surface type) were used as the control group, and 27 implants, explanted from patients with peri-implantitis, were evenly divided into three subgroups according to the cleaning method used. Surface morphology was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and elemental composition was analyzed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Results. Laser treatment demonstrated versatility and cleaning efficiency without damaging the microrelief for all types of surfaces. The Air Flow air-abrasive method was most effective for the RBM surface, but showed residual surface contamination when treated with TiO2 and SLA. The ultrasonic method using the Vector Paro device was especially effective for the TiO2 surface, probably due to its hydrophilic properties. Conclusion. The choice of decontamination method for the treatment of peri-implantitis should take into account the surface type and characteristics of the dental implant. The Er, Cr:YSGG laser proved to be a universal and effective method, while Air Flow and Vector Paro were more efficient when used for specific surface types.

Russian Journal of StomatologyVol. 18(3)
Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center (RU), Krasnoyarsk State Medical University (RU), MED Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the influence of different methods of processing three types of dental implant surfaces on their morphology and elemental composition in the treatment of peri-implantitis — Taras V. Furtsev, A. V. Shabanov, et al. · Russian Journal of Stomatology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS