Deep Ensemble Learning and Explainable AI for Multi-Class Classification of Earthstar Fungal Species

The current study presents a multi-class, image-based classification of eight morphologically similar macroscopic Earthstar fungal species (<i>Astraeus hygrometricus</i>, <i>Geastrum coronatum</i>, <i>G. elegans</i>, <i>G. fimbriatum</i>, <i>G. quadrifidum</i>, <i>G. rufescens</i>, <i>G. triplex</i>, and <i>Myriostoma coliforme</i>) using deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques. For the first time in the literature, these species are evaluated together, providing a highly challenging dataset due to significant visual overlap. Eight different convolutional neural network (CNN) and transformer-based architectures were employed, including EfficientNetV2-M, DenseNet121, MaxViT-S, DeiT, RegNetY-8GF, MobileNetV3, EfficientNet-B3, and MnasNet. The accuracy scores of these models ranged from 86.16% to 96.23%, with EfficientNet-B3 achieving the best individual performance. To enhance interpretability, Grad-CAM and Score-CAM methods were utilised to visualise the rationale behind each classification decision. A key novelty of this study is the design of two hybrid ensemble models: EfficientNet-B3 + DeiT and DenseNet121 + MaxViT-S. These ensembles further improved classification stability, reaching 93.71% and 93.08% accuracy, respectively. Based on metric-based evaluation, the EfficientNet-B3 + DeiT model delivered the most balanced performance, with 93.83% precision, 93.72% recall, 93.73% F1-score, 99.10% specificity, a log loss of 0.2292, and an MCC of 0.9282. Moreover, this modeling approach holds potential for monitoring symbiotic fungal species in agricultural ecosystems and supporting sustainable production strategies. This research contributes to the literature by introducing a novel framework that simultaneously emphasises classification accuracy and model interpretability in fungal taxonomy. The proposed method successfully classified morphologically similar puffball species with high accuracy, while explainable AI techniques revealed biologically meaningful insights. All evaluation metrics were computed exclusively on a 10% independent test set that was entirely separate from the training and validation phases. Future work will focus on expanding the dataset with samples from diverse ecological regions and testing the method under field conditions.