The Genetic Data Market: Institutional Governance of Academic/Industry Research Partnerships for the Public Good

The Trump Administration's cuts to research funding and opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion is destabilizing academic research. These attacks coincide with pointed government support for the private sector. But the conceptualization of academic versus private sector health research has historically been a false binary. Drawing on mixed methods research, this paper examines the genomic data market as an example of advantages and challenges of commercializing academic expertise. It also highlights the structural downsides of researchers individually navigating industry partnerships. While academia is currently being put in the unenviable position of being more likely to need the private sector to conduct research, with less federal funding to offer in exchange, structural pain points have existed for decades. This is an opportunity for academia to harness its powers of expertise and collective action to develop institutional policy to ensure academic/industry research is beneficial to the public health and diverse patient communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Bioethics
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2025.2554770
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Genetic Data Market: Institutional Governance of Academic/Industry Research Partnerships for the Public Good

Kayte Spector‐Bagdady
13 citations
The American Journal of Bioethics
Intellectual Property and Patents
35.89
article

The Genetic Data Market: Institutional Governance of Academic/Industry Research Partnerships for the Public Good

Kayte Spector‐Bagdady
article en
13 citations

Abstract

The Trump Administration's cuts to research funding and opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion is destabilizing academic research. These attacks coincide with pointed government support for the private sector. But the conceptualization of academic versus private sector health research has historically been a false binary. Drawing on mixed methods research, this paper examines the genomic data market as an example of advantages and challenges of commercializing academic expertise. It also highlights the structural downsides of researchers individually navigating industry partnerships. While academia is currently being put in the unenviable position of being more likely to need the private sector to conduct research, with less federal funding to offer in exchange, structural pain points have existed for decades. This is an opportunity for academia to harness its powers of expertise and collective action to develop institutional policy to ensure academic/industry research is beneficial to the public health and diverse patient communities.

The American Journal of BioethicsVol. 25(12)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Intellectual Property and Patents
35.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.