Impoliteness as a Social Strategy in Online Communication among China Chinese Youths: Resistance, Solidarity, and Power on BILIBILI

This study explores how Chinese youths employ impolite language as a strategy to resist authority on the video-sharing platform Bilibili. It further investigates how such language use contributes to the emergence of China’s “cancel culture” and reshapes power dynamics in digital spaces. Drawing on Culpeper’s impoliteness taxonomy and Goffman’s theory of face, the analysis reveals that users frequently adopt positive impoliteness tactics to challenge public figures, undermine their moral legitimacy, and mobilize collective disapproval. The findings suggest that online impoliteness functions not merely as personal expression but as a powerful discursive tool for grassroots resistance and the reconfiguration of sociopolitical hierarchies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90210010
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impoliteness as a Social Strategy in Online Communication among China Chinese Youths: Resistance, Solidarity, and Power on BILIBILI

Peng Linfeng, Hu Yangfan, Wu Runjun Nur Salwa Abd Wahid, Intan Norjahan Azman
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Social Media and Politics
article

Impoliteness as a Social Strategy in Online Communication among China Chinese Youths: Resistance, Solidarity, and Power on BILIBILI

Peng Linfeng, Hu Yangfan, Wu Runjun Nur Salwa Abd Wahid, Intan Norjahan Azman
article en

Abstract

This study explores how Chinese youths employ impolite language as a strategy to resist authority on the video-sharing platform Bilibili. It further investigates how such language use contributes to the emergence of China’s “cancel culture” and reshapes power dynamics in digital spaces. Drawing on Culpeper’s impoliteness taxonomy and Goffman’s theory of face, the analysis reveals that users frequently adopt positive impoliteness tactics to challenge public figures, undermine their moral legitimacy, and mobilize collective disapproval. The findings suggest that online impoliteness functions not merely as personal expression but as a powerful discursive tool for grassroots resistance and the reconfiguration of sociopolitical hierarchies.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.