The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine sentiment among Brazilian healthcare workers: A cross-sectional online survey study

Background Vaccine hesitancy (VH) and vaccine sentiment (VS) among healthcare workers (HCWs) play a crucial role in vaccination programs. In response to this global challenge, an international project was initiated to investigate the determinants of VS. Method From 2022 to 2023, an anonymous cross-sectional online survey was disseminated to assess Brazilian HCWs’ characteristics, attitudes, and information sources regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Five psychological constructs were derived using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and associated with five VS (vaccination attention, vaccine intention, vaccine confidence, general attitude, and health system confidence) through multivariate logistic regressions. Results The prevalence of VH was low among 634 participants (3.9%), and VS was generally positive. Most HCWs reported strong knowledge confidence (7.3/10), high fear of infection (8.0/10), broad agreement on vaccine necessity (98%), and frequently adopted institutional websites (85.4%) or scientific societies (70.8%) as information sources. Extended from the 5C model, obligated collective responsibility (OCR), representing a professional sense of duty, was significantly associated with vaccine intention, confidence, and attention. Trust in institutional websites emerged as a key determinant of positive VS, while institutional skepticism persisted, especially among HCWs in hospitals, universities, and research settings. “Calculation” was not a significant factor, potentially due to HCWs’ time constraints. Social media, friends, or community members did not significantly link to VS. Conclusions This study identifies key determinants of VS and introduces OCR as a novel expansion to the 5C model. Enhancing VS will require trusted, concise institutional communication and ethics-driven workplace policies that appeal to HCWs’ professional responsibilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Health Economics and Policy
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7189/001c.144190
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine sentiment among Brazilian healthcare workers: A cross-sectional online survey study

Luís Eugênio Portela Fernandes de Souza, C. P. Lo, Guilherme Loureiro Werneck, Luca Regazzi et al.
Journal of Global Health Economics and Policy
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine sentiment among Brazilian healthcare workers: A cross-sectional online survey study

Luís Eugênio Portela Fernandes de Souza, C. P. Lo, Guilherme Loureiro Werneck, Luca Regazzi, Carla Magda Allan Santos Domingues, Ramon da Costa Saavedra, Marta Lomazzi, Tzu‐Yao Lin, Michael Moore
article en

Abstract

Background Vaccine hesitancy (VH) and vaccine sentiment (VS) among healthcare workers (HCWs) play a crucial role in vaccination programs. In response to this global challenge, an international project was initiated to investigate the determinants of VS. Method From 2022 to 2023, an anonymous cross-sectional online survey was disseminated to assess Brazilian HCWs’ characteristics, attitudes, and information sources regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Five psychological constructs were derived using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and associated with five VS (vaccination attention, vaccine intention, vaccine confidence, general attitude, and health system confidence) through multivariate logistic regressions. Results The prevalence of VH was low among 634 participants (3.9%), and VS was generally positive. Most HCWs reported strong knowledge confidence (7.3/10), high fear of infection (8.0/10), broad agreement on vaccine necessity (98%), and frequently adopted institutional websites (85.4%) or scientific societies (70.8%) as information sources. Extended from the 5C model, obligated collective responsibility (OCR), representing a professional sense of duty, was significantly associated with vaccine intention, confidence, and attention. Trust in institutional websites emerged as a key determinant of positive VS, while institutional skepticism persisted, especially among HCWs in hospitals, universities, and research settings. “Calculation” was not a significant factor, potentially due to HCWs’ time constraints. Social media, friends, or community members did not significantly link to VS. Conclusions This study identifies key determinants of VS and introduces OCR as a novel expansion to the 5C model. Enhancing VS will require trusted, concise institutional communication and ethics-driven workplace policies that appeal to HCWs’ professional responsibilities.

Journal of Global Health Economics and PolicyVol. 5
University of Geneva (CH), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), University of Canberra (AU), Maastricht University (NL), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS (DE), Pan American Health Organization (Brasil) (BR), Secretaria da Saúde (BR), World Federation of Public Health Associations (CH), Hospital Ana Nery (BR), Pan American Health Organization (Cuba) (CU), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.