Metacognitive Strategy Networks in GenAI-Enhanced Learning: An Epistemic Network and Lag Sequence Analysis of High and Low Self-Efficacy Students

Many studies have demonstrated that generative AI (GenAI) feedback has potential in language learning; however, few studies explore how learners' self-efficacy shapes their metacognitive and behavioural engagement with GenAI feedback. This study investigates differences in metacognitive strategy networks and behavioural sequences between high and low self-efficacy learners interacting with GenAI feedback in reading comprehension tasks. By integrating epistemic network analysis (ENA), sequential analysis, and retrospective interviews, this study analysed the interactions of 16 junior secondary students with five types of GenAI feedback. The results revealed that high self-efficacy learners develop metacognitive networks centred on evaluating and dynamically cycling between feedback types to inform future learning. In contrast, low self-efficacy learners displayed a metacognitive strategy network dominated by planning and linear behavioural sequences that prioritise immediate task completion. The findings advocate for self-efficacy-driven GenAI feedback systems that dynamically tailor metacognitive scaffolding to catalyse personalised self-regulated learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icaie64856.2025.11158315
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metacognitive Strategy Networks in GenAI-Enhanced Learning: An Epistemic Network and Lag Sequence Analysis of High and Low Self-Efficacy Students

Xiaoming Cao, Wei Wei, Ziqi Chen
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Metacognitive Strategy Networks in GenAI-Enhanced Learning: An Epistemic Network and Lag Sequence Analysis of High and Low Self-Efficacy Students

Xiaoming Cao, Wei Wei, Ziqi Chen
article en

Abstract

Many studies have demonstrated that generative AI (GenAI) feedback has potential in language learning; however, few studies explore how learners' self-efficacy shapes their metacognitive and behavioural engagement with GenAI feedback. This study investigates differences in metacognitive strategy networks and behavioural sequences between high and low self-efficacy learners interacting with GenAI feedback in reading comprehension tasks. By integrating epistemic network analysis (ENA), sequential analysis, and retrospective interviews, this study analysed the interactions of 16 junior secondary students with five types of GenAI feedback. The results revealed that high self-efficacy learners develop metacognitive networks centred on evaluating and dynamically cycling between feedback types to inform future learning. In contrast, low self-efficacy learners displayed a metacognitive strategy network dominated by planning and linear behavioural sequences that prioritise immediate task completion. The findings advocate for self-efficacy-driven GenAI feedback systems that dynamically tailor metacognitive scaffolding to catalyse personalised self-regulated learning.

Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.