Comparing Perspectives of Students and Experts Regarding Using ChatGPT in Learning International Politics: A Case Study of China-ASEAN AI Cooperation

Through mix-method research, this study explores the role of ChatGPT in learning international politics, using China-ASEAN AI cooperation as a case. By comparing perspectives between students and experts, we assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT -generated responses in facilitating international political learning. A total of 95 students and 5 experts were recruited in the study. Results indicate that students generally trust ChatGPT as a credible information source, viewing it as an effective tool for grasping complex political concepts. However, experts highlight significant limitations, including a lack of depth in responses, potential ideological biases, and insufficient critical analysis of nuanced issues. These differences indicate the need for cautious integration of AI in the field of international politics. The findings suggest that while ChatGPT could serve as a valuable supplementary resource, it should not replace traditional learning methods or expert guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icaie64856.2025.11158625
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Perspectives of Students and Experts Regarding Using ChatGPT in Learning International Politics: A Case Study of China-ASEAN AI Cooperation

Yuheng Ding
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Comparing Perspectives of Students and Experts Regarding Using ChatGPT in Learning International Politics: A Case Study of China-ASEAN AI Cooperation

Yuheng Ding
article en

Abstract

Through mix-method research, this study explores the role of ChatGPT in learning international politics, using China-ASEAN AI cooperation as a case. By comparing perspectives between students and experts, we assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT -generated responses in facilitating international political learning. A total of 95 students and 5 experts were recruited in the study. Results indicate that students generally trust ChatGPT as a credible information source, viewing it as an effective tool for grasping complex political concepts. However, experts highlight significant limitations, including a lack of depth in responses, potential ideological biases, and insufficient critical analysis of nuanced issues. These differences indicate the need for cautious integration of AI in the field of international politics. The findings suggest that while ChatGPT could serve as a valuable supplementary resource, it should not replace traditional learning methods or expert guidance.

Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.