Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Ideological and Political Courses Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

This study addresses the challenges in the comprehensive evaluation of ideological and political courses by innovatively applying the AHP, overcoming the limitations of traditional evaluation methods. A rigorous evaluation framework was constructed, comprising five first-level indicators and 15 second-level indicators, with precise quantification of their respective weights. The research reveals, for the first time, that school support holds the highest weight in the teaching evaluation of ideological and political courses, while the weights of second-level indicators exhibit unique variations across different dimensions. Based on this, a five-tier scoring and rating standard (A-E) was established, achieving a refined and scientific evaluation of ideological and political teaching. This study fills the academic gap in the precise determination of indicator weights and the integration of evaluation methods for ideological and political courses, providing a new approach and robust support for improving teaching quality and development, while pioneering new directions in the field of ideological and political course evaluation.