Zero Trust Security in Modern Networks: A Survey of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

The zero trust paradigm experiences widespread adoption in leading domains such as cloud computing, Internet of Things, and blockchain. Nonetheless, actual deployment faces substantial technical and managerial challenges. A comparative analysis of the traditional perimeter-defense security model and the zero trust model explores their distinctions in identity management, fine-grained authorization, and dynamic access control. The analysis emphasizes the technical solutions and empirical outcomes of implementing zero trust security mechanisms in multi-cloud environments, smart device networks, and decentralized systems. The study demonstrates that zero trust, through continuous authentication, the principle of least privilege, and multilayered dynamic security policies, effectively mitigates internal threats and lateral movements, yet it still encounters significant challenges related to performance overhead, deployment complexity, and standardization. Finally, the paper outlines future optimization directions and research hotspots, thereby providing theoretical reference and practical guidance for further exploration in related fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iaeac65194.2025.11166187
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zero Trust Security in Modern Networks: A Survey of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Shuai Cui, Min Zhao, Kangjian Qu
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

Zero Trust Security in Modern Networks: A Survey of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Shuai Cui, Min Zhao, Kangjian Qu
article en

Abstract

The zero trust paradigm experiences widespread adoption in leading domains such as cloud computing, Internet of Things, and blockchain. Nonetheless, actual deployment faces substantial technical and managerial challenges. A comparative analysis of the traditional perimeter-defense security model and the zero trust model explores their distinctions in identity management, fine-grained authorization, and dynamic access control. The analysis emphasizes the technical solutions and empirical outcomes of implementing zero trust security mechanisms in multi-cloud environments, smart device networks, and decentralized systems. The study demonstrates that zero trust, through continuous authentication, the principle of least privilege, and multilayered dynamic security policies, effectively mitigates internal threats and lateral movements, yet it still encounters significant challenges related to performance overhead, deployment complexity, and standardization. Finally, the paper outlines future optimization directions and research hotspots, thereby providing theoretical reference and practical guidance for further exploration in related fields.

PLA Army Engineering University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Zero Trust Security in Modern Networks: A Survey of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions — Shuai Cui, Min Zhao, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS