An Empirical Multidimensional Evaluation of Response Quality in Medical Automatic Question-Answering Systems

This study addresses the challenge of evaluating response quality in medical automatic question-answering (QA)systems. Based on an established multidimensional index framework, we conduct an empirical analysis of ZuoYi-GPT using real-world medical QA data. Text mining and natural language processing techniques are employed to quantitatively extract indicator values, and an improved CRITIC-based objective weighting method is applied for indicator weighting. The results reveal that the accuracy dimension carries the highest weight (87.58%), and the overall response quality is relatively high, with high- and medium-quality responses accounting for 84.21% of the total. However, shortcomings are observed in aspects such as medical terminology density, syntactic diversity, and structural completeness. The findings provide empirical support for the targeted optimization of AI-based medical applications and offer methodological insight for information quality assessment in other vertical domains under the development of large-scale language models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iaeac65194.2025.11166383
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Empirical Multidimensional Evaluation of Response Quality in Medical Automatic Question-Answering Systems

Jiaxin Li, Qian Wang, Yanying Shang, Jianxun Li et al.
Topic Modeling
article

An Empirical Multidimensional Evaluation of Response Quality in Medical Automatic Question-Answering Systems

Jiaxin Li, Qian Wang, Yanying Shang, Jianxun Li, Jinggong WEI
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of evaluating response quality in medical automatic question-answering (QA)systems. Based on an established multidimensional index framework, we conduct an empirical analysis of ZuoYi-GPT using real-world medical QA data. Text mining and natural language processing techniques are employed to quantitatively extract indicator values, and an improved CRITIC-based objective weighting method is applied for indicator weighting. The results reveal that the accuracy dimension carries the highest weight (87.58%), and the overall response quality is relatively high, with high- and medium-quality responses accounting for 84.21% of the total. However, shortcomings are observed in aspects such as medical terminology density, syntactic diversity, and structural completeness. The findings provide empirical support for the targeted optimization of AI-based medical applications and offer methodological insight for information quality assessment in other vertical domains under the development of large-scale language models.

Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Empirical Multidimensional Evaluation of Response Quality in Medical Automatic Question-Answering Systems — Jiaxin Li, Qian Wang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS