<b>The Effect of Mid-pregnancy Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Pregnancy Outcomes: the TESGO Randomized Controlled Trial</b>

<p dir="ltr">Objective: Newborns delivered by women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have accelerated intrauterine growth earlier than the current recommended screening period. We aimed to determine if universal GDM screening at 18-20 weeks’ gestation improves pregnancy outcomes compared with standard screening at 24-28 weeks’ gestation, using a single oral glucose intolerance test (OGTT).</p><p dir="ltr">Research Design and Methods: We conducted a dual-center parallel randomized controlled trial with a planned interim analysis in singleton pregnant women comparing the effect of mid-pregnancy screening for GDM at 18-20 weeks’ gestation and standard screening at 24-28 weeks’ gestation. GDM was universally screened and diagnosed using 75g OGTTs and the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. The primary outcome was a composite measure of primary cesarean section, birth weight >90th percentile, neonatal hypoglycemia, cord serum C-peptide >90th percentile, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and birth trauma. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03523143).</p><p dir="ltr">Results: The trial was stopped early for futility after the interim analysis. Of the 967 women included in the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome was not significantly different between the two groups. Neonatal hypoglycemia was significantly lower and neonatal adiposity in women with GDM was higher in the mid-pregnancy screening group compared with the standard screening group. Adverse event rates were similar between the two groups.</p><p dir="ltr">Conclusions: Advancing universal GDM screening to mid-pregnancy at 18-20 weeks’ gestation may not improve pregnancy outcomes, except for a reduction in neonatal hypoglycemia. Newborns of women diagnosed with GDM through mid-pregnancy screening had higher neonatal adiposity.</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2337/figshare.30047794.v1
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Mid-pregnancy Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Pregnancy Outcomes: the TESGO Randomized Controlled Trial

Yu‐Han Chang, Ming‐Hua Ho, Chih-Yao Hsu, Tzu-Yi Chen et al.
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

The Effect of Mid-pregnancy Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Pregnancy Outcomes: the TESGO Randomized Controlled Trial

Yu‐Han Chang, Ming‐Hua Ho, Chih-Yao Hsu, Tzu-Yi Chen, Kang‐Chih Fan, I‐Weng Yen, Yi-Yun Tai, Szu‐Chieh Chen, Chien‐Nan Lee, Kuan-Ying A. Huang, Jin‐Chung Shih, Chun‐Heng Kuo, Jessica Kang, Hung‐Yuan Li, Ming‐Wei Lin, Shin‐Yu Lin, Chin-Hao Chang, Chin-Ho Cheng, Wen-Wei Hsu
article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">Objective: Newborns delivered by women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have accelerated intrauterine growth earlier than the current recommended screening period. We aimed to determine if universal GDM screening at 18-20 weeks’ gestation improves pregnancy outcomes compared with standard screening at 24-28 weeks’ gestation, using a single oral glucose intolerance test (OGTT).</p><p dir="ltr">Research Design and Methods: We conducted a dual-center parallel randomized controlled trial with a planned interim analysis in singleton pregnant women comparing the effect of mid-pregnancy screening for GDM at 18-20 weeks’ gestation and standard screening at 24-28 weeks’ gestation. GDM was universally screened and diagnosed using 75g OGTTs and the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. The primary outcome was a composite measure of primary cesarean section, birth weight >90th percentile, neonatal hypoglycemia, cord serum C-peptide >90th percentile, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and birth trauma. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03523143).</p><p dir="ltr">Results: The trial was stopped early for futility after the interim analysis. Of the 967 women included in the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome was not significantly different between the two groups. Neonatal hypoglycemia was significantly lower and neonatal adiposity in women with GDM was higher in the mid-pregnancy screening group compared with the standard screening group. Adverse event rates were similar between the two groups.</p><p dir="ltr">Conclusions: Advancing universal GDM screening to mid-pregnancy at 18-20 weeks’ gestation may not improve pregnancy outcomes, except for a reduction in neonatal hypoglycemia. Newborns of women diagnosed with GDM through mid-pregnancy screening had higher neonatal adiposity.</p>

Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.