Safety-I Versus Safety-II: A Mixed-Methods Study Revealing the Imbalance of Approaches in Primary Care Medication Safety
This study revealed a fundamental limitation in applying Safety-I principles to primary care medication safety, particularly the assumption that all system defects can be feasibly fixed. Given the complex realities of primary care, a complementary Safety-II perspective is essential, as it recognizes the agency of professionals and patients in managing risks within distributed work systems affected by uncontrollable external forces.
Authors
- Annesha White (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5095-2470)
- Kimberly G. Fulda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5096-2983)
- Richard A. Young (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2766-5737)
- Yan Xiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2805-0619)
- Ayşe P. Gürses (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7422-6852)
Institutions
- University of North Texas (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- JPS Health Network (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Patient Safety
- Published
- 2025-09-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000001400
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.03